The Far East was plunged into more uncertainty as the UK slept, with Japanese residents ordered to take shelter.
A rocket fired from North Korea, the fifth missile launched this week, passed over the nation's airspace in a stark reminder of the tensions that still exist in the region.
With much of the world focused on the war in Ukraine, the test adds further uncertainty to a fragile-seeming world.
Here's what you need to know about the latest developments.
音声注意、北朝鮮のミサイル発射の警報 pic.twitter.com/haMz82CZk5
— ぷに (@punichang) October 3, 2022
What happened?
At around 7.22am this morning North Korea launched a ballistic missile which travelled over Japan.
Residents were warned to take cover and look out for falling debris, and the weapon crashed into the sea around 22 minutes later.
The missile was not armed with a nuclear device and no-one was harmed.
Why did North Korea launch the missile?
This is the first time the North has fired a missile over Japan since 2017 and it comes at a time of escalating tensions in the region.
South Korea, Japan and the United States last week resumed joint naval exercises for the first time since, you guessed it, 2017. It's fair to assume this is Kim Jong-Un's response to that.
Read More: What it's like to experience a nuclear blast
The North Korean leader has long believed the three countries are preparing for war on his own nation, which is still technically at war with the South following the armistice of 1953 which saw the peninsula divided.
There have been no direct military confrontations since then but with no peace treaty signed the countries are still formally at war.
How much of a threat is North Korea?
This missile travelled further than any previous missile launched by the DPRK (to give it its formal name), travelling over 1,000 miles and reaching the height of the International Space Station.
Its range means the North could, in theory, hit the U.S overseas territory of Guam.
Will there be nuclear tests?
That's very likely. The last time Japan, South Korea and the U.S conducted exercises, the North fired two missiles over Japan and conducted a nuclear test a week later.
They had already test-fired two short-range ballistic missiles, which landed in the sea between the Korean peninsula and Japan, and a nuclear test would likely be the next step.
The last test, in 2017, saw the DPRK claim to have detonated a hydrogen bomb that could be fitted to an intercontinental ballistic missile - a step up from the conventional atom bomb.
Is that true?
North Korea is famously secretive so there's no way of knowing for sure.
Developing the H bomb means moving from a fission to a fusion device and it's not thought any country with those capabilities would help the DPRK with that technology.
It's been suggested that what they tested was instead a fusion-boosted fission device - essentially a halfway house.
However, Tom Plant, director of proliferation and nuclear policy at the Royal United Services Institute said at the time: "The North Koreans do bluff sometimes, but when they make a concrete claim about their nuclear programme, more often than not it turns out to be true."
What happens next?
The ramped-up missile testing has been condemned as "dangerous and reckless" by the UN Security Council and been dubbed "violent behaviour" by Japan's Prime Minister.
For their part, the North would say that the resumption of naval exercises is provocation on the part of Japan, the U.S and South Korea.
All-out war is unlikely, with the DPRK likely using recent missile launches to emphasise its military capability in the event of an invasion - something the three allied countries have repeatedly said they have no intention of doing.
A historic summit in 2018 saw the leaders of both the North and South commit to working toward a treaty to formally end the war but recent escalations make that unlikely.
It looks like the uneasy stalemate will continue for some time yet.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here