ENVIRONMENTAL campaigners believe Glasgow tower blocks earmarked for demolition should be retrofitted.
Friends of the Earth has highlighted the link with the environmental impact of high rises in Maryhill being pulled down and the city’s commitment to the way Glasgow uses materials.
It has criticised the proposal saying the demolition plans by Wheatley Homes Glasgow, and supported by Glasgow City Council, go against the council’s climate commitments.
Read more: Glasgow tower blocks’ demolition brings community spirit in the sky to an end
Four tower blocks on the site of the former Maryhill barracks would be demolished with 600 homes replaced with 300 mid-market rented development as part of a £54million project.
Wyndford Residents Union has been fighting the case to have the flats retained as they say it will break up a community.
Operated by Scotland’s largest social landlord Wheatley Homes Glasgow, GHA, four blocks – Nos 120, 151, 171 and 191 Wyndford Road – are expected to be demolished.
However, it’s the city council’s position which Friends of the Earth believe is particularly important.
Kim Pratt, circular economy campaigner at Friends of the Earth Scotland said: “Glasgow City Council has made a strong commitment to transform the way the city uses materials. Moving to a circular economy, by doing things like retrofitting rather than wasting materials, will help limit the environmental damage that’s caused by extracting more.
“Glasgow City Council must stick to these promises and consider the option to retrofit the Wyndford Estate tower blocks rather than demolish them.”
Read more: Glasgow streets closed due to filming of TV crime drama
Wheatley Homes Glasgow is the largest social landlord in Scotland, managing 40,000 homes across Glasgow, including Wyndford estate. It told tenants about the plans to demolish the blocks to make space for new homes at the end of last year, explaining that they would be rehoused.
Friends of the Earth said neither Wheatley Homes Glasgow nor the council have considered the environmental case for retrofitting rather than demolition, but numerous architects and tower block specialists consulted by the Wyndford Residents Union suggest this is possible, preferable and more sustainable. They argue retrofitting is a more sustainable, lower carbon strategy than demolishing and rebuilding because it uses less materials and energy.
Gloria Lo, from Architects Climate Action Network Scotland, said the cycle of demolition and new build is wasteful and polluting the planet.
She added: “It is never the right choice in a climate emergency and fuel poverty crisis. Wyndford Estate should not be demolished when the greener, better and sensible option to retrofit is so readily available. We need our existing housing and communities protected and cared for. Architects and built environment professionals are leading with Retrofit strategies in other areas of Scotland - Glasgow should be no different.”
A Glasgow City Council spokesman said: “The council is absolutely committed to a sustainable, circular economy as part of our work to address the Climate Emergency. We will work with our partners to support the retrofitting of homes and properties where this is appropriate – but it should be recognised that this is not the best approach in every case.”
A Wheatley Homes Glasgow spokesman said the four blocks are no longer fit for modern-day living nor meet the type and quality of housing people have a right to expect and demand.
He added: “The regeneration will see hundreds of new energy-efficient, affordable homes built on the site and also wider investment, including better car parking and bin stores; internal upgrades to tenants’ homes, and new lighting and CCTV.
“We are absolutely committed to the green agenda. Only last year we launched our ‘Greener Homes, Greener Lives’ campaign which will see £100m invested in sustainability initiatives to reduce carbon emissions and help eliminate fuel poverty.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel