LIKE Ian McNair (Letters, September 2) I too am totally scunnered with our Scottish Government’s alcohol restrictions.
Whilst I fully accept that our track record is far from healthy, I do not understand the thinking behind the policies being effected to curb excess and anti-social behaviour.
If I wish to go shopping at 9.30am or even 10.30pm to avoid crowds I am unable to purchase alcohol. What possible justification can our leaders give for such nonsense?
I can at least understand the minimum pricing thinking despite considering this measure pointless, but the purchase restrictions and train bans are just plain tiresome and do absolutely nothing to improve our misuse of the demon drink.
I am convinced the point is to be seen to be doing something – not necessarily something sensible or effective, just something.
Forbes Dunlop, Glasgow.
WHY TRAIN BAN SHOULD STAY
QUESTION: why can’t we enjoy a drink on a ScotRail train ("Now ministers won’t trust us to enjoy a tipple on the train", The Herald, September 2, and Letters, September 2)?
Answer: young men (and young women too) whose drinking to excess utterly spoils rail journeys.
Regrettably, I’m for continuance of the ban.
Gordon Casely, Crathes.
• IN Alan Simpson's article on alcohol on trains, his happy acceptance of free beer for the masses in North Korea horrified me. Has he never read 1984?
Jane Stewart, Melrose.
GORBACHEV DESERVES MORE CREDIT
ALISON Rowat is much too downbeat in her assessment of Mikhail Gorbachev (“East or West, who is best to judge Gorbachev’s success?”, The Herald, September 1).
Of all the Soviet leaders, he was most obviously the exception in his open-mindedness, ability and vision. That is before any assessment of his achievements. So to describe him as “ultimately a politician like any other” seems well wide of the mark viewed from both Russian and western perspectives.
Once in power his policies, internally and abroad, were bold and far-reaching. So much so, in fact, that he undercut his own power base, the Communist Party. Reconstruction and transparency (perestroika and glasnost) became ubiquitous terms in the West, in good part because of the sheer unexpectedness of his internal policies and the extent to which they loosened the grip of an authoritarian party and state. Free elections and free speech, freer immigration and foreign travel came as complete surprises in the West, inured to the restrictions and stasis of the Soviet system.
In foreign policy, Gorbachev’s speech at the UN in New York, in December 1988 renounced the “Brezhnev doctrine”, which had kept Eastern Europe firmly in the Soviet orbit. In the following year, all the Communist leaders there were ousted, without any sign of Soviet intervention. Then came the reunification of Germany, resisted, ironically, by Mrs Thatcher but not Gorbachev.
In defence policy, annual summits led to reductions in strategic nuclear weapons and the removal of short- and medium-range nuclear weapons in Europe.
Much of Russia’s economic transition problems can be ascribed to Boris Yeltsin’s government, which insisted, with western advice and support, on “shock therapy”. Its consequences did a great deal to alienate ordinary Russians from democracy and market economics. A unique and historic opportunity was, tragically, lost.
None of that was Gorbachev’s doing. What he did achieve, however, was quite enough to justify calling him a great man rather than “a politician like any other”.
Alasdair Rankin, Edinburgh.
PIONEER HONOURED AT LONG LAST
WITH no ceremony or fanfare of any kind, in Bathgate and only as a result of an initiative by Bathgate Community Council as well as with funding from the Scottish Government, a long-standing injustice in Scottish history was recently – partially – remedied. For as part of Bathgate Community Council's bid to increase visitors to the town, an interpretation board has now been installed in the Steelyard in Bathgate which for the very first time anywhere in the world recognises the achievements and life of Peter McLagan, Scotland's and the UK's most successful mixed-race MP in the 19th century, who was MP for my county of Linlithgowshire (now West Lothian) from 1865-1893. In total he was re-elected seven times in a row – no mean feat for any politician, let alone someone of M. McLagan's mixed race heritage.
The installation of this board was the first time that his life was duly acknowledged as well as the fact that he was of mixed race parentage, his father being a Scots coffee planter in British Guinea (now Guyana), his mother a free-born black woman. I say "partially remedied" because he shares the panel with other prominent men and events in Bathgate's history, but at least a start has been made to right this particular wrong.
Accordingly, I have now written to my MP, Martyn Day, MSP Fiona Hyslop as well as the Presiding Officer to the Scottish Parliament, to inquire whether or not something more substantial should now be done to commemorate the life of Peter McLagan and the wider significance of his life in Scottish and British history?
David W Main, Bathgate.
MAKE CYCLE BELLS MANDATORY
I TOO would like to hear cyclists using their bells to warn pedestrians of their approach (Letters, September 1). What bells? I never see a cyclist with a bell fitted. A bell ought to be mandatory.
Ronald Singleton, Glasgow.
EGGS: SHOULD I CHICKEN OUT?
I NOTE the various concerns over piscatorial wriggly things, potatoes and their eyes, ears of corn, and baby carrots etc ( Letters, September 1 & 2), but for my squeamish self they pale into insignificance when I reflect now on where my harmless wee morning egg has been hiding.
R Russell Smith, Largs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel