Bosses at a hotel which would later go up in flames claiming the lives of two men were told by a fire inspector about the danger of storing combustible materials in certain cupboards.
Simon Midgley, 32, and Richard Dyson, 38, died when a fire broke out at the Cameron House hotel, near Balloch, on the banks of Loch Lomond on December 18 2017.
A fatal accident inquiry heard on Thursday that in August that year James Clark, of the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, had highlighted some concerns to the hotel in a routine inspection.
“Where the integrity of walls or ceilings has been breached to effect repair work or allow services to pass, they should be reinstalled or fire-stopped using materials which provide the original standard of fire resilience. Attention should be given to the concierge cupboard,” his report said.
And in the six-point letter sent to the hotel, he said: “All fire doors should have the self-closing devices checked, adjusted/repaired or replaced and thereafter maintained self-closing from all angles of opening, including the fully open position.”
He added: “Combustible storage should not be locked in the cupboard containing mains electrical installation apparatus.”
David McKerry, who was property manager at the time, accompanied Mr Clark on his inspection and told Crown counsel Graeme Jessop that he arranged for the voids to be filled “there and then” by a contractor who was already on site.
The 45-year-old told the inquiry that staff were asked for newspapers to be removed from the room, and when checked on by the end of the day, they had been and had been tidied up.
Craig Paton, 46, who was general manager at the hotel, told the inquiry he was not aware kindling was stored in the cupboard, and said he understood it to contain just a fuse board and not a mains electrical installation.
In the early hours of December 18, night porter Christopher O’Malley emptied ash and embers from a fuel fire into a plastic bag, and then put it in a cupboard of kindling and newspapers. The hotel then set on fire.
When Mr Paton was called to the hotel after the blaze had broken out, he told the inquiry he remembered seeing “smoke billowing from the hotel” and the “light from the fire lighting up the sky line”.
He said at some point when he arrived he was “made aware there was potentially guests missing” and was later under the impression that a roll call of guests had already been completed.
The inquiry was told on Tuesday that in 2016 Mark Clayton, the director of Veteran Fire Safety, said there should be a written policy in place for clearing ashes from open fires and grills.
Sebastian Pinn, 48, who was the deputy general manager at the hotel until the summer of 2016, told the inquiry he had not prepared the policy for the open fire.
Michael Wisekal, a fire investigator who was tasked by West Dunbartonshire Council to produce a report on the safe handling of ash, told the inquiry a written procedure would have made sure everybody was following the same process.
He told the inquiry of ways someone cleaning a fire could check if the ashes were hot, which included moving the ash around with a metal shovel in the fire or using an infrared thermometer.
Mark Stewart QC, acting for O’Malley, asked if a temperature probe used for something like measuring how warm a joint of beef was would tell someone if the ashes were still hot. “I imagine it would,” Mr Wisekal told him.
Hotel operator Cameron House Resort (Loch Lomond) Ltd was previously fined £500,000 over the fire, and night porter Christopher O’Malley, who admitted breaching health and safety laws, was given a community payback order.
The inquiry at Paisley Sheriff Court, before Sheriff Thomas McCartney, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here