A woman fleeing a burning hotel feared for her life as she crawled through thick, black smoke, an inquiry has heard.
Pauline Booth, 52, and her husband, Scott, escaped the blaze at the five-star Cameron House Hotel in December 2017.
The inferno claimed the lives of Simon Midgley, 32, and his partner, Richard Dyson, 38, from London.
A Fatal Accident Inquiry into the fire at the hotel on the banks of Loch Lomond, near Balloch, is being held at Paisley Sherriff Court.
Mrs Booth was woken by a “piercing” fire alarm in the early hours of Monday, December 18 2017.
The inquiry heard she told her husband: “I jumped up and looked out the window and saw black smoke. I said, “quick, quick, we need to get ready, it’s definitely a real fire.”
READ MORE from the inquiry:
Upon exiting her room, Mrs Booth said the smoke made it difficult to see a clear escape route. “The smoke was really dense, it was black and it was heavy,” she told the inquiry.
“We were on the floor, looking for the main staircase, crawling below the smoke.”
She told the inquiry that the smoke was around a “metre from the floor”.
Upon arriving at the main stairway, the couple realised they could not go any further as they could see the fire from the bottom of the stairway.
The couple turned around, again, crawling below the smoke and feeling for an exit.
“We thought we were trapped,” Mrs Booth recalled.
“We didn’t know there was another exit and we knew we couldn’t get out another way.
“It felt like I was in there a long time because I was having to feel around and couldn’t see, trying to find an opening for a door.
“I eventually found what must have been a fire door.
“As soon as we got through that door it was like a different world. There was no smoke, we could see other people who were totally unaware of what we had gone through in that area.”
Mrs Booth became emotional as she recalled meeting Mr Midgley and Mr Dyson at the spa and restaurant on the evening before the fire.
“As we went back to our room that night, they were having a night cap so we said goodnight. They looked like they were having a nice night and enjoying themselves,” she said.
The couple eventually escaped the hotel and congregated with others on the grassy area near the front of the hotel.
But Mrs Booth recalled the distress of seeing a couple with their child trapped inside the hotel, signalling for help at a window above.
“My husband and I walked away. We couldn’t watch it. We knew what they were saying and that no-one could help them until the fire service came.
“We were very lucky to get out and knew how difficult it was. It was quite disturbing because they had a child.”
Later, the couple were sent to the boat house with other hotel guests where Mrs Booth told the court she became distressed upon hearing Mr Midgley and Mr Dyson’s name repeatedly called during a roll-call, but to no answer.
“The staff were calling the same names and they weren’t responding and because it was the two young guys that weren’t responding I was getting uneasy because I knew they were in a suite near us.”
Hotel operator Cameron House Resort (Loch Lomond) Ltd was previously fined £500,000, and night porter Christopher O’Malley was given a community payback order over the fire.
Dumbarton Sheriff Court heard in January last year that the fire started after O’Malley emptied ash and embers from a fuel fire into a polythene bag, and then put it in a cupboard of kindling and newspapers.
The hotel firm admitted failing to take the necessary fire safety measures to ensure the safety of its guests and employees between January 14 2016 and December 18 2017.
The company admitted two charges of breaching the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005.
O’Malley admitted breaching sections of health and safety laws which relate to the obligation on an employee to take reasonable care for the health and safety of people affected by their acts or omissions at work.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel