IS polio back?
The news that polio is spreading anywhere in the UK for the first time in nearly 40 years is understandably cause for a robust public health response, but so far there no cause for alarm.
Back in 1947, when Britain was hit by its worst ever outbreak of poliomyelitis, there were 1,434 confirmed cases in Scotland and 131 deaths - mostly in children under five.
READ MORE: Polio boosters for children as virus spreads in London
In 1950s America, polio was said to be "second only to the atomic bomb" as the thing citizens dreaded the most, with summer outbreaks leaving hundreds of children paralysed or dead every year, and many more disabled for life.
Thanks to a highly effective vaccine, the threat has been largely eradicated - although the case of an unvaccinated 20-year-old New York man paralysed by an infection caused by the same strain which appears to be circulating now in London is a reminder never to be complacent when it comes to potentially deadly viruses.
Ironically though, the source of the current outbreak is a form of the vaccine. The oral polio vaccine contains a weakened, live poliovirus and is used in countries where polio is still present because it stops the spread of the virus by inducing immunity in the gut, where it replicates.
READ MORE: How a polio vaccine tragedy changed thinking on vaccine harm
Individuals vaccinated in this way can excrete the virus in their faeces (hence why polio is monitored through sewage surveillance). It is likely that a visitor to London introduced the virus in this way.
Usually these cases are self-contained; but not this time. Genetic mutations shared some of the samples (and the New York case) show that it is transmitting, albeit in small numbers .
The race is now on to ramp up vaccine coverage in London, targeting the communities where uptake in children is lowest, in order to build a wall of immunity to block off the virus and contain it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel