A man who authorities want to extradite to the US is set to go on trial accused of threatening two hospital medics.
Arthur Knight, whom US officials claim to be Nicholas Rossi, appeared at Glasgow Sheriff Court on Thursday charged with acting aggressively towards a consultant and senior charge nurse at the city’s Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH).
The court was told he got up from his hospital bed on Tuesday “screaming” and approached the two staff members “like a raging bull, red-faced and cursing”.
Knight, whose identity is still in dispute and who was on bail in relation to his case at the Edinburgh Sheriff Court, denies the accusations.
He was denied bail and remanded in custody.
The charge document said Knight goes by other names such as Nicholas Rossi, Nicholas Alahverdian, Nicholas Brown, Arthur Winston Brown and Arthur Knight Brown.
Rossi is wanted over the rape of a 21-year-old woman in Utah in September 2008 and is said to have faked his death and fled to Scotland to evade the charge.
READ MORE: Man facing extradition seeking to delay proceedings, court told
Prosecutor Julie Clark told the court the man in the dock, who said his name is Arthur Knight, has previously been identified by police witnesses and medical professionals as Rossi, who is on an extradition request in relation to the sexual attack.
“This man has denied that he is that person and has refused to give DNA or fingerprints to evidence that position,” she said.
Ms Clark said Rossi is a registered sex offender in the US and wanted for other crimes including fraud, sexual battery and evading justice.
Knight, who appeared in a wheelchair and wearing a dressing gown, slippers and an oxygen mask, could be heard shouting back: “That’s not true.”
He was asked by Sheriff Gerard MacMillan, heading the case, to be quiet on several occasions.
Ms Clark went on to tell the court the accused failed to attend four court cases in June due to “ill health”.
He was initially due to appear by video-link at a Glasgow Sheriff Court in relation to the hospital disturbance but failed to show, the court heard.
Ms Clark then spoke of a medical note she had in her evidence, saying: “The most recent one (note) said there was no concern relating to his lungs and the description of seizures were faked.
“Having taken unwell last night, this man again became unwell, was taken to QEUH and, when seen by a doctor this morning, was discharged and deemed fit for court.
“This is a man who has repeatedly told the court, Crown and the press that he is unfit for extradition.”
Ms Clark added: “This is not a suitable man to be provided bail.
“He’s proven he can’t be trusted and therefore he should be remanded in custody.”
Munawar Ali, the on-duty solicitor, was called to represent Knight due to his solicitor not being in court.
He told the court the accused should be granted bail based on having no previous convictions and his health.
“He had Covid-19 and after that the seizures,” Mr Ali said.
“On the basis of his medical condition, I ask that my lordship grant him bail.”
Mr Ali said other allegations made against Knight are in relation to a hearing at the Sheriff Court in Edinburgh and should therefore not be considered when deciding on matters related to the hospital disturbance.
The hearing was interrupted for a short while after Knight asked to have a new oxygen tank attached to his mask before violently shaking in his wheelchair.
The accused could then be heard at the end saying: “I am not Nicholas Rossi, and the problem here is that the medical records state I have fundamental epilepsy, not fake seizures.”
Addressing Knight, Sheriff MacMillan said he was taking “the whole background” into consideration when denying him bail.
“I feel you may abscond and fail to appear at a diet,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article