CANCER patients will face increasingly long waits for life-saving scans and diagnoses within four years according to a report which forecasts that Scotland’s NHS is headed for a growing shortfall of radiologists.
The analysis by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) found that Scotland currently has 103 fewer consultant radiologists than required to meet demand - equivalent to a shortfall of 23 per cent.
However, this is projected to increase to 189 - or a 30% shortfall - by 2026 amid a rise in part-time working, trainee shortages, and the impact of stress and burnout leading more senior medics to quit or retire early at a time when record numbers of patients are on waiting lists for CT scans, MRIs and diagnostic ultrasounds.
Clinical radiologists are the vital medical specialists required to analyse scans for signs of cancer or other disease, while interventional radiologists carry out minimally-invasive image-guided procedures such as aneurysm repair, which has been shown to cut the length of time patients spend in hospital and to improve recovery - for example, after a stroke.
READ MORE: Thousands stranded in A&E amid spiralling bed and nurse shortages
Across the UK, the report found that a total of 200 radiologist posts have been unfilled for a year or more, with the NHS as a whole becoming increasingly reliant on overseas doctors to plug gaps.
By September last year, 25% of clinical radiology consultants had been trained outside the European Economic Area - up from 20% in 2016.
In Scotland, looming shortages of clinical oncologists - the doctors who treat cancer - were also highlighted in the report, with the shortfall projected to increase from 13% now to 21% by 2026.
The RCR census of cancer centre heads of service found that eight in ten of those based in Scotland are concerned that workforce shortages are impacting on patient care - the highest level of concern in the UK.
Every month cancer treatment is delayed raises the risk of death by around 10%.
READ MORE: 'Risk to patient safety' on 33 wards of Glasgow superhospital at peak of last Covid wave
RCR President, Jeanette Dickson, said: "The situation we’re in is simply unsustainable, and as these reports show, the impact of doctor shortages is being felt across the country and affecting our ability to diagnose devastating illnesses such as heart disease and stroke, but also our ability to diagnose and treat cancer in a timely manner.
"Doctors are burnt out and if we don’t address these workforce issues soon, the picture is going to get a lot worse in future years.”
Official guidelines state that patients referred for a key diagnostic test - which includes ultrasound, CT and MRI scans used in radiology - should wait no longer than six weeks.
However, the latest figures from Public Health Scotland show that lengthy waits have spiralled as a result of the pandemic, which resulted in all but the most urgent scans being paused and a drop in referrals while routine cancer screening was put on hold and fewer patients went to GPs with symptoms.
The RCR report stressed that million of these “missed scans” UK-wide, on top of the already growing demand for imaging, will have a knock on effect for years to come and “will result in yet more pressure on the [clinical radiology] workforce and will inevitably further impact on waiting times and patient outcomes”.
READ MORE: Nurse and midwifery numbers up by just 280 as thousands quit over job pressure
NHS staff absences due to Covid self-isolation requirements are also slowing efforts to tackle the backlog.
By the end of March this year, around 120,000 people in Scotland were waiting for a diagnostic radiology test - nearly double the pre-pandemic average of 66,000.
In the year before Covid, fewer than 9000 patients on average were waiting over six weeks for a radiology test.
This has now risen to over 55,000, of whom 26,000 have been waiting over 13 weeks - something almost unheard of pre-pandemic.
In Lanarkshire, which had the longest radiology delays in Scotland, two thirds of patients were waiting over six weeks for tests.
By March 31, almost as many patients in Lanarkshire had received an CT scan within seven days (471 patients) as had waited three to six months (462 patients).
In the Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GGC) and Tayside health boards - the next worst performing in Scotland - more than half of patients were waiting over six weeks for a radiology test.
Extra mobile CT and MRI units are being targeted to areas with the highest demand, but the RCR report notes that some patients also “wait several weeks for their results to be reported due to the sheer size of workforce shortages”, compounding treatment delays.
The report notes that some areas of Scotland are facing "chronic long-term workforce shortages", with 67% of clinical radiology vacancies in Scotland unfilled for at least a year, and the supply of interventional radiologists - at 8.6 per million - "significantly lower" than England's 11.2 per million.
However, the College praised Scotland for its comparably low spend on outsourcing - half compared to England - and said it was going "from strength to strength" in its use of imaging networks, which pool expertise to speed up how quickly patients can be seen.
Scotland's current and projected shortfalls of radiologists are also below the UK average, but remain "a significant gap, made more concerning by the fact that these shortages are more prevalent in remote regions".
A Scottish Government spokesman said patients referred with an urgent suspicion of cancer "continue to be prioritised" for tests, with the number of consultant oncologists in NHS Scotland having nearly doubled since 2006.
He added: “Recruitment within the oncology professions is a challenge around the world.
"Detailed recovery plans for Diagnostic Imaging have been developed with each NHS Board to increase capacity, workforce and activity during 2022 and 2023.
"Six mobile MRI and five mobile CT scanners will also support to help clear waiting lists as boards embed new ways of working and extend hours to improve the delivery of the services going forward.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel