US president Joe Biden has said that the "basic fairness and the stability of our law demand" that the Supreme Court does not overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v Wade case that legalised abortion nationwide and said he would work to codify the right to abortion into federal law.
In a statement released a day after a political news organisation released a draft opinion that suggested the high court could be poised to overturn the ruling, Mr Biden said he could not speak to the authenticity of the draft and said his administration was preparing for all eventualities for when the court ultimately ruled.
Mr Biden said a decision overturning Roe would raise the stakes for voters in November's heated midterm elections.
"If the court does overturn Roe, it will fall on our nation's elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman's right to choose," Mr Biden said.
"And it will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this November. At the federal level, we will need more pro-choice senators and a pro-choice majority in the house to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law."
A decision to overrule Roe would lead to abortion bans in roughly half the states and could have huge ramifications for this year's elections.
But it is unclear if the draft represents the court's final word on the matter, as opinions often change during the drafting process.
Whatever the outcome, the Politico report late on Monday represents an extremely rare breach of the court's secretive deliberation process, and on a case of such importance.
"Roe was egregiously wrong from the start," the draft opinion states. It was signed by Justice Samuel Alito, a member of the court's six-three conservative majority who was appointed by former president George W Bush.
The document was labelled a "1st Draft" of the "Opinion of the Court" in a case challenging Mississippi's ban on abortion after 15 weeks, a case known as Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organisation.
The court is expected to rule on the case before its term ends in late June or early July.
The draft opinion in effect states there is no constitutional right to abortion services and would allow individual states to more heavily regulate or actually ban the procedure.
"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," it states, referencing the 1992 case Planned Parenthood v Casey that affirmed Roe's finding of a constitutional right to abortion services but allowed states to place some constraints on the practice.
"It is time to heed the constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives."
A Supreme Court spokeswoman said the court had no comment and The Associated Press could not immediately confirm the authenticity of the draft Politico posted, which dates from February.
The draft opinion strongly suggests that when the justices met in private shortly after arguments in the case on December 1, at least five voted to overrule Roe and Casey, and Justice Alito was assigned the task of writing the court's majority opinion.
Votes and opinions in a case are not final until a decision is announced or, in a change brought about by the coronavirus pandemic, posted on the court's website.
The report comes amid a legislative push to restrict abortion in several Republican-led states - Oklahoma being the most recent - even before the court issues its decision.
Critics of these measures have said low-income women will disproportionately bear the burden of the new restrictions.
The leak jumpstarted the intense political reverberations that the high court's ultimate decision was expected to have in the midterm election year.
Already, politicians on both sides of the aisle were seizing on the report to fundraise and energise their supporters on either side of the issue.
An AP-NORC poll in December found that Democrats increasingly see protecting abortion rights as a high priority for the government.
Other polling shows relatively few Americans want to see Roe overturned.
People on both sides of the issue quickly gathered outside the Supreme Court waving signs and chanting, following the release of the Politico report.
Reaction was swift from elected officials in Congress and across the country.
In a joint statement from Congress' top two Democrats, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said: "If the report is accurate, the Supreme Court is poised to inflict the greatest restriction of rights in the past 50 years - not just on women but on all Americans."
Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch said in a statement: "We will let the Supreme Court speak for itself and wait for the court's official opinion." But local officials were praising the draft.
"This puts the decision making back into the hands of the states, which is where it should have always been," Mississippi state representative Becky Currie said.
Until now, the court has allowed states to regulate but not ban abortion before the point of viability, at around 24 weeks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here