Turning the #MeToo movement, one of the most divisive and significant moments in modern gender politics, into a comedy is no mean feat, even for Steve Coogan.
In Chivalry, a new Channel 4 comedy-drama written by and starring Alan Partridge actor Coogan, 56, and Him & Her star Sarah Solemani, 39, the comedic duo tackle the question of romance and working relationships in post-#MeToo Hollywood.
Coogan plays Cameron, an old-school Hollywood movie producer at the top of the power pyramid. He has to work with Solemani's Bobby, an up-and-coming feminist director, to re-cut a movie that's been derailed by a #MeToo scandal.
The idea for Chivalry was born out of a "quite heated" personal debate between Coogan and Solemani when the #MeToo movement came to a head.
"We started talking about it, arguing about it, and also laughing about it," says Solemani. "We started thinking: 'What if we put two opposing characters in dialogue, and made it a dialectic where we're just debating?' The answer, it turns out, is that they fall in love, but with a whole lot of learning along the way."
An ensemble cast appears alongside the duo including Wanda Sykes, Sienna Miller, Lolly Adefope, Robert Lonsdale and Aisling Bea, as well as some surprising Hollywood cameos.
But how do you create a genuinely funny piece of comedy about a topic so serious?
We catch up with the programme's writers and stars ahead of the launch.
#METOO IS SUCH A COMPLICATED TOPIC TO COVER, ESPECIALLY IN A COMEDY. WHAT WERE THE BIGGEST DEBATES THAT CAME UP?
SC: The big thing for me, the premise of the whole series, was how does romance thrive in a post-#MeToo environment? Let's tell a story about two people who are in the midst of this new landscape, who fall in love with each other whilst negotiating these things. Maybe then the question will answer itself.
SS: One of the biggest debates that came out of #MeToo was a concern that it was somehow going to be the death of sex. In the show, this is why Bobby talks so explicitly about sex.
When you have proper conversations about consent, you're actually opening up opportunity for more sex and more pleasure because it's a proper dialogue where women's needs and women's pleasure is taken into consideration.
Trying to wrangle all of those massive, complex, confusing themes into a scene or into a moment was what we talked about a lot.
WHAT DOES COMEDY AND HUMOUR ALLOW YOU TO DO THAT PURE DRAMA DOESN'T?
SC: In terms of the comedy, we were very careful about it. Once you know how you can find these comedic moments, when you become confident with it, it's knowing when not to do a joke, not to employ comedy when you know you could. To have the guts to be sincere sometimes, which is not an intuitive thing, certainly for me!
SS: It makes it harder, because you have to do both! You have to keep it suspenseful but you've got to find the humour and give the audience permission to relax.
#MeToo is a universal confession of trauma and pain, and we don't want to undermine that. We wanted to shine a light on that, and at the same time let some of the tension out.
Marta, our director, was really good in reminding us of not being scared to go to some of the darker areas, and then Steve is always so kind of ruthless when it came to the comedy, it had to be the funniest moment we could possibly invent.
YOU BOTH LIVE IN THIS WORLD, BUT WHAT DID YOU DO IN TERMS OF RESEARCH AND PREPARATION?
SC: We do live in this world, so we're aware of what's going on in terms of the media and discussions and new protocols, we're aware of all that.
Being in the industry means it's not a huge leap to put yourself in a slightly different place, it was just taking things that you sometimes feel and amplifying them, adding some extra things to make it complex and provocative.
There's definitely a Venn diagram where our characters overlap with who we are.
SS: It's less about research, but more about exploration of our journeys, because Steve and I have had such different journeys and different challenges.
I was really relieved when he would ask not just difficult questions for the show, but difficult questions of himself.
This took a lot of trust and sharing and inquiry, so that we could craft characters that, hopefully, feel real.
THE FIRST TWO EPISODES ARE SET IN HOLLYWOOD: DID IT HAVE TO BE SET IN THE STATES, OR COULD THAT HAVE BEEN IN THE UK?
SS: Hollywood is such a heightened, extreme place, and there's a reason the #MeToo movement started here. So it felt like a natural base for it, but it was very important to us that it didn't feel like an in-joke.
Actually, any public-facing business has to deal with these issues, so it can be any workplace where you're juggling this new, chaotic landscape where what you say can sometimes feel policed. Hopefully people will relate to it, even if they don't have any knowledge of Hollywood.
WHAT DID YOU ENJOY MOST ABOUT WORKING TOGETHER?
SC: Writing with Sarah was just like spending time with a friend every day. That's what was enjoyable: just writing with Sarah and feeling safe to explore things that I would not have felt safe doing alone. That made it fun, because I trusted her judgement implicitly, but I didn't always trust my own!
SS: He really makes me laugh: he'd send me a text, or make a joke on a session and I will be laughing for days afterwards. And also getting an insight into an incredible life and incredible career - that is fascinating. And, like you said, feeling safe enough. It was a very trusting, enjoyable, safe working environment.
Chivalry airs on Channel 4 at 10pm on Thursday
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here