A Glasgow woman has been left “distraught” after falling victim to a bank scam that emptied the family’s accounts.
Catherine LeMay said her childrens' accounts had also been affected and wanted to share her experience to alert others to the fraudulent scheme, which BBC anchor Emily Maitlis revealed she had almost fallen victim to.
Mrs LeMay said she responded to a text purporting to be from Royal Mail about a missed parcel and clicked on a link to rebook it.
The mother-of-two, who lives in Glasgow's west end, said this had happened during the school run while she was "rushing and flustered" and so she hadn't checked the authenticity of the website. She paid £1.15 for a re-delivery.
She mentioned the text to a friend who warned her that it could be a scam.
She said: “I looked again at the website and realised it was a replica and quickly phoned Santander to cancel my card. The card hadn’t been used so I was fairly calm at this point.”
READ MORE: Which? warning about holiday scams and travel fraud
Two days later, again at a time when she was preparing to collect her children from school, she received a phone call from “Mark from Santander” who spoke with an English accent and said he was from the fraud department and wanted to discuss some unusual activity on her account.
She said: “I queried whether he was from the bank and he asked me to open the Internet and check the phone number.
“It was indeed a Santander number. He stayed on the phone for over an hour telling me about the parcel ‘Fishing Scam’ that 36,000 people across the UK has been hit by, including me.”
She said he asked her about a payment of £1.15, then took her through a security check, which she said had allayed her fears about the authenticity of the call.
He told her the bank had discovered "lots of suspicious activity" in her account including three attempts to apply for credit cards in her name and pornography websites trying to take money.
He said a Samsung phone in Liverpool was logged into her internet banking account.
He said he was going to set her up with a new account and advised her to transfer her funds as, “ all her money was at risk.”
She said: “He ‘randomly generated’ a new account number and sort code so I could pay the money to my new account without alerting the fraudsters who would try and grab all my money if they realised what I was doing.”
The mother-of-two, who worked for Santander herself before studying for a law degree, said she was still a bit unsure but he then sent her a security text purporting to be from the bank.
READ MORE: Calls on legislate on online scam ads as Scots fear fraud epidemic
She said: “In the cold light of day it sounds like I was pretty naïve but at the heightened state of panic I just wasn’t thinking straight and I thought I was doing the right thing to save our money.
"He was being so helpful, saying that there were gangs operating in Liverpool but I wasn't to worry because they were going to make sure my accounts were safe."
She made two payments to this 'new account' but while doing so her husband called to tell her that Santander had been in touch to alert the family to the fraud. By which point the fraudster had hung up "with all the family’s savings".
She said she had “hardly stopped crying” since Thursday and had reported the scam to the police but was now feeling relieved after Santander agreed to deposit the funds she had lost back into her account.
BBC presenter Emily Maitlis revealed today that she almost fell victim to a similar bank fraud scheme.
The former Newsnight anchor wrote about her experience on Twitter and described how the sophisticated scam was nearly successful.
Like Mrs LeMay, the presenter said a missed parcel had provided the "way in" for the fraudsters.
She said: "I got called by the fraud detection squad at my bank and told I’d been a victim of fraud with attempts made on my bank account. I asked how I knew he was for real snd he told me to google the lost and stolen cards number.
"Sure enough the same number came up. So I listened as he told me I’d had attempts made on my card, my accounts had been visualised , and my email was also compromised. I’d have to change everything over. I was horrified. I suspected it was because I’d clinked on a link for a missed parcel.
Post script: the weirdest thing is - I never ever ever pick up my phone normally. To anyone. And I’m now thinking that’s the sanest life decisión I have made ...
— emily m (@maitlis) March 27, 2022
"And that was there way in. So I then asked for the name and email of the fraud detection guy. And suddenly the phone went dead. So I called back my bank and said I’ve just spoken to one of your guys about attempts made on my account and thy said no you haven’t.
"So then it dawns on me the fraud detection call is actually the fraudster. And I feel sick. Because it’s all a but matrix. And I tell the story to a friend at lunch the next day whose face slowly drains as he realises the exact same thing has happened to him.
"And they even played the “ this call will be recorded for training purposes” schpiel at the beginning. To make it sound bona fide so this is I think a now recurring thing that gets you at your most vulnerable by telling you you’re already a victim early evening. Off guard."
Katie Watts, consumer expert at MoneySavingExpert said both women had been targeted by a "common and awful" scam called ‘safe account’ fraud.
She said: "The seemingly small-time stealing of a few quid through a fake redelivery text then leads to a sophisticated follow-up where criminals pretend to be from your bank and then get you to transfer all your money to a ‘new’ and ‘safe’ bank account.
"A real bank would never ask you to do this – you don’t need to transfer money to secure your account.
"If you receive a suspicious call from your bank when you aren’t expecting it, hang up and contact it using either the official number on your card or bank statement, or by dialling 159 (though not all banks are part of this service).
"As a general rule, never click links in text messages or emails you weren’t expecting.
"If you think it might be real, search for the real website independently instead and use its official customer services."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel