Author of Silent Earth: Averting the Insect Apocalypse, Dave Goulson has called for a ban on pesticide use in gardens. A petition launched by the insect expert, who is Professor of Biology a tthe University of Susssex, recently closed with 53,000 signatures backing his call to "ban the use of pesticides in urban areas & end their sale for use in gardens."
The petition noted, "Wild bees and other wildlife are in decline, a potential catastrophe for us all. Pesticides also threaten human health, many of them being carcinogens and/or neurotoxins. One way to help combat bee decline is to encourage them in urban areas."
“We just don’t need pesticides in our gardens," Goulson said. "Why would we spray poison where our children and pets play? There is abundant evidence that these chemicals harm wildlife and many are toxic to us too.”
The Uk would be following in the wake of France, which has already created such a ban. Goulson said, "France banned urban pesticides in 2018. Paris has not been over-run with dandelions and greenfly. If France can do it, so can we.”
Goulson has also recently published research which shows the difference even a small area of wild flower meadow can make. Even a 4m2 area of mini-meadow sown with commercially available wildflower seed can be enough to provide a rich habitat for pollinators.
Researchers found that "in the year following seed-sowing, mini-meadows were supporting on average 111 percent more bumblebees compared to control plots where no wildflowers had been sown. These resource rich habitats also attracted 87 percent more solitary bees, and 85 percent more solitary wasps."
READ MORE: 15 ways to help butterflies and bees to make your garden their home
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel