Lewis Hamilton believes Formula One’s stewards are biased and has demanded action is taken ahead of the new season.
The 37-year-old British driver was back on track, two months and 11 days after he was denied a record-breaking eighth world championship, for the first day of winter testing at Barcelona’s Circuit de Catalunya.
Since the deeply controversial Abu Dhabi finale, the FIA has acted by firing Michael Masi – the man who bent the rules and allowed Max Verstappen the chance to take the title following a late safety car – in a revamp of race control.
But Hamilton now says the sport’s governing body must turn its attention to the stewards’ room.
Four officials from a rotating pool steward every Grand Prix and at least one of those will be a driver who has raced at a competitive level.
Vitantonio Liuzzi, who competed for Red Bull in 2005 and then its sister team, formerly Toro Rosso, in 2006 and 2007, was employed by the FIA at four of the 22 races last year. Former British driver Derek Warwick was also used on a number of occasions.
“We need to make sure we have non-biased stewards,” said Hamilton.
“Some of the former race drivers, who are now stewards, are very good friends with certain individuals, some travel with certain individuals, and tend to take more of a keen liking to them.
“So people who have no bias, are going to be super-central when it comes to making decisions.”
However, in a rare moment of unity, Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff and his Red Bull rival Christian Horner refuted Hamilton’s suggestion.
“I don’t think it is a conscious bias,” said Wolff. “The stewards are intelligent people.
“But there needs to be a standard. This is what we deserve and this is what we expect.
“The most important topic is inconsistency and there shouldn’t be a lot of room to interpret the rules. I have faith in (FIA president) Mohammed (Ben Suleyman) that going forward we will optimise the new structure.”
Horner said: “I am not aware of any stewards travelling with drivers to races, and I certainly don’t think there was bias from any stewards in the last seasons.”
A spokesperson for the sport’s governing body told the PA news agency: “The FIA is proud of its global stewarding pathway that connects and develops the most talented stewards from across motor sport.
“This has resulted in a strong, independent and experienced group of officials who carry out their work with impartiality and the utmost professionalism.”
Hamilton made his claim despite insisting moments earlier that he wanted to put the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix behind him.
Asked if he was owed an apology by the FIA, Hamilton said: “I am here solely to focus on my job which is to get on top of the new car and the new regulations and move the team forward.
“There is no point looking back. It is done, dusted, so we move forward.”
F1 emerged from its winter hibernation following the biggest revamp of the sport’s technical rulebook in a generation.
But surprisingly the opening day passed off without major incident for the grid’s major players, with British driver Lando Norris fastest of all for McLaren, six-tenths clear of Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc. George Russell was fourth on his first day for Mercedes, two-tenths quicker than team-mate Hamilton.
Mileage, rather than outright pace, is the key to testing and world champion Verstappen, ninth overall, completed 147 laps – more than any other driver.
F1 motorsport managing director Ross Brawn, the driving force behind the new regulations, recently claimed that Mercedes and Red Bull could be at a disadvantage after their 2021 title battle went to the wire.
So, is Hamilton concerned? “Why would I ever think that?” he replied.
“We have won eight constructors’ titles in a row. Why would I ever feel that way?
“My team doesn’t make mistakes. Of course, there is always a risk, but we don’t make mistakes.
“I trust in my team 100 per cent. Whatever we start with today – whether it is good or bad – we will work through it.”
The test in Barcelona concludes on Friday ahead of three further days of running in Bahrain before the opening round in the Gulf Kingdom on March 20.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here