A council leisure quango has announced an independent investigation into the sacking of its general manager after a tribunal branded the process biased and unreasonable.
Gerry Campbell was sacked from his role as general manager of South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture (SLLC) after officials from the area’s council botched an investigation into claims he mishandled a staff grievance.
An employment tribunal found that a string of errors by council leaders and staff led to his unfair dismissal, while he also won claims for breach of contract and unfair dismissal.
An internal row over how things should progress also led to the then SLLC chair, Councillor David Watson, being forced from his post with the body, resulting in him withdrawing from the SNP.
SLLC has now announced that it will instruct an independent legal firm to look at what went wrong in Mr Campbell’s case, however opposition councillors fear this will not go far enough.
Councillor Joe Fagan, leader of the South Lanarkshire Labour Group, said: “There should be a full inquiry into all aspects of how this case was handled, by both the Trust and the Council.
“The tribunal findings raise serious questions about the actions of senior councillors in overruling the previous chair of SLLC. Those councillors must be accountable for their decisions.
“To ensure the lessons of this case are fully learned, there must be full cooperation with a comprehensive inquiry.”
Mr Watson, now an independent councillor, added that the investigation must look at the decisions taken by key council figures, including leader John Ross, deputy leader Maureen Chalmers and business manager Peter Craig.
He said: “There needs to be an independent investigation into the actions of council staff who were involved in this fiasco.
“The council’s political leadership should resign or be removed from post as they have shown themselves not fit for public office. If they refuse to resign, the SNP, nationally or locally, should remove them from their candidates list.
“Their actions nearly destroyed the reputation of a long term and respected member of staff and put him and his family under extraordinary pressure.”
Mr Campbell was dismissed in 2019 after a grievance was made by a member of staff involving senior management.
SLLC received external legal advice which stated that as it was an Arms-length External Organisation, it had to be “truly independent” of the local authority should not involve it in the grievance procedure.
Despite this, officials from the council insisted on stepping in and went on to remove Mr Watson from post when he disagreed.
Mr Campbell was also then subject to a disciplinary for allegedly failing to follow the legal advice.
A string of errors by council officials, including failing to interview key witnesses, reporting inaccuracies as fact, and non-impartial panel members being appointed to the disciplinary hearing, then led to his dismissal.
The employment tribunal found that the process was “biased against [Mr Campbell]” and “well outside the band of reasonable procedures”.
The tribunal also said it was “struck” by the way the council’s leaders removed Mr Watson from post when he disagreed with the plans.
Mr Watson, who had been an SNP member for 38 years, left the party shortly after this and wrote to SNP chief executive Peter Murrell about his concerns but received no response.
He has written again following the tribunal’s decision and is still awaiting a reply.
A spokesman for SLLC said: “The SLLC Board met on 10 February and asked the General Manager and Company Secretary to take forward an independent review in order that lessons can be learned.
“The exact scope and timescales are being determined but it is likely that the review will be undertaken by an independent external employment law provider who has no previous involvement in the process.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article