A British woman found guilty of lying about being gang-raped in Cyprus has won her appeal to overturn the conviction at the country's supreme court.
The 21-year-old university student from Derby was given a suspended four-month jail term in 2020 by a Cypriot judge who found her guilty of public mischief following a trial at Famagusta district court in Paralimni.
She told police she was attacked by up to 12 Israeli tourists in a hotel room while on holiday in the party town of Ayia Napa on July 17 2019.
The woman was charged after signing a retraction statement 10 days later but has since maintained she was pressured by officers to withdraw the rape allegation.
Her team of English and Cypriot lawyers took her appeal to the supreme court in the capital Nicosia in September, arguing the conviction is unsafe and should be set aside.
On Monday, the court allowed the appeal and overturned the conviction, according to her lawyers, who welcomed the decision but said her original allegations should now be investigated.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson handed Sue Gray's partygate report as 'version' submitted to No10
The woman's Cypriot lawyer, Nicoletta Charalambidou, said: "This is a very important day for women's rights and in particular for victims of rape or other forms of sexual violence in Cyprus.
"The acquittal by the supreme court of the young teenager points to the failure of the authorities to effectively investigate the rape claims she reported. This is what we will now pursue."
The woman, who had vowed to clear her name having flown back to the UK hours after she was sentenced, and her family did not attend the hearing.
Her family said in a statement: "It is a great relief we hear that the authorities in Cyprus have recognised the flaws in their legal process.
"Whilst this decision doesn't excuse the way she was treated by the police or the judge or those in authority, it does bring with it the hope that my daughter's suffering will at least bring positive changes in the way that victims of crime are treated.
"Of course, if justice is to be done, an authority would need to pick up on the evidence that was gathered in Cyprus and do with it what should have happened at the outset."
READ MORE: Almost 6,000 new cases recorded on day Scots return to offices
During last year's appeal hearing, the woman's lawyers said the retraction statement, which formed the basis of the prosecution case, should never have been admitted into evidence because it was made by a vulnerable teenager who had spent almost seven hours in a police station without a lawyer.
Ms Charalambidou also said the lower court started from the position that there was no rape and had misunderstood the offence of public mischief, which requires a false statement of a make-believe crime.
She said the trial judge, Michalis Papathanasiou, did not allow the defendant to talk about the alleged rape, pointing to the seven times he said: "This is not a rape trial."
He was also said to have ignored defence expert evidence and failed to consider police failures in investigating the rape allegations.
Sentencing the woman in January 2020, the judge said the evidence showed she had "lied", but added: "Her psychological state, her youth, that she has been away from her family, her friends and academic studies this year, this has led me to decide to give her a second chance and suspend the sentence for three years."
The 12 Israeli men and boys arrested over the incident, aged between 15 and 20 at the time, denied any wrongdoing. They were freed and returned home.
The British lawyer who coordinated the appeal, Michael Polak, from the Justice Abroad organisation, said: "This is a watershed moment, not just for our client who has always maintained her innocence even when doing so caused her the hardship of not being able to return home during the lengthy trial proceedings, but also for others around the world in similar positions.
"We have always maintained that our client was not given a fair trial and today the supreme court of Cyprus has agreed with us."
READ MORE: Yellow alert for high winds issued for Tuesday
He added: "We are pleased that our team has managed to secure this result against the odds and believe that the next step for justice to be done in this case is a full review and investigation by a different police force of the rape complaint put forward by our client.
"We hope that vital safeguards to ensure that something like this does not happen again in Cyprus, such as the recording of all interviews in police stations, which has been discussed in the Cyprus parliament, are put in place as soon as possible."
Lewis Power QC added: "It is with great joy that we learn that this young woman has at last received the justice she so rightly deserved, that which had been thus far so cruelly and unjustly denied.
"We hope that this decision will have far-reaching implications in the pursuit of justice for other victims of sexual assault.
"We commend the Cypriot supreme court for having the courage and wisdom to deliver this judgment."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel