THE past few years have seen a significant sea-change within sport.
There has been a realisation that sport must be a safe place for individuals and that, sadly, in countless cases, it has not been.
The revelation about the widespread sexual abuse by USA Gymnastics team doctor, Larry Nassar, may be the highest-profile case but there are many, many more examples of coaches abusing their position.
Such is the acknowledgement that abuse cases may not have been dealt with appropriately in the first instance, UK Athletics this week announced they are to review all historical safeguarding cases involving sexual activity or grooming with a child or adult at risk where this did not result in a permanent ban.
It is likely to involve an estimated 30 to 40 cases, dating back to 2004.
This is, clearly, an encouraging and positive step forward.
Of course, the question has to be asked as to why any coach who has been convicted of such serious offences would be in a position to return to the sport at all but at least action is being taken.
This development is, at least in part, down to the campaigning of Kyniska Advocacy, the organisation which was co-founded by Scottish athletics internationalist, Mhairi MacLennan.
In these pages last weekend, I spoke with MacLennan, who herself has been the victim of abuse at the hands of a coach, and her desire to push for change.
That a still-active athlete has the determination to devote such time and energy to such a cause, which has, at times, been to the detriment of her athletics, is hugely impressive.
The problem, unfortunately, though, is that without athletes such as MacLennan, the American gymnasts and the numerous other individuals who have spoken out, it’s hard to imagine there would have been such progress.
Too often, it is still the athletes who are pushing for change rather than those running the sport.
There remains, perhaps understandably but inexcusably, a sense within some sports that any revelations about abuse would be so damaging that they are better not being uncovered.
UK Athletics must be applauded for taking positive action; it would have been all too easy to have let sleeping dogs lie but instead, they have recognised that the absence of lifetime bans in so many cases is a significant cause for concern.
The issue remains, however, of how to ensure sport is a universally safe place.
Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to create a water-tight environment.
Coaching, by its nature, requires a level of physical contact, as well as, often, one-to-one sessions meaning it is unspeakably hard to ensure there is no scope for abuse.
Despite that, though, there must be a bigger effort to make sport a safer environment than it currently is.
As MacLennan herself said, athletics is doing considerable work in this area but there are many sports which are lagging much further behind.
Individuals like MacLennan cannot be relied upon to do the brunt of the work when it comes to ensuring change.
The excellent development over recent years, thanks to things like the Me Too movement, is that there has been a culture shift ensuring that individuals are not nearly as powerless as they once were.
The days of women and girls, and far less often, boys, being dismissed are almost completely gone but there is no doubt there remains a fear from most about breaking their silence.
MacLennan, who is a hugely intelligent, educated and articulate woman, admitted that she was extremely scared about speaking out so one can barely imagine how daunting a prospect it must be for some others who are not in the same position as MacLennan.
To speak up about abuse, almost always, turns into the athlete’s word against the coach’s.
For some, maybe even many athletes, going through the ordeal of speaking up and having to relive such trauma, will be too much to face.
UK Athletics are leading the way when it comes to trying to make their sport safer but there is still a long way to go until sport as a whole is a safe environment for everyone who’s a part of it.
AND ANOTHER THING…
For all the controversy that preceded this year’s Australian Open – the tennis was barely mentioned in the week leading up to the event thanks to Novak Djokovic and deportation-gate – any fears that the tournament itself would be devalued or tainted as a result of the saga were quickly allayed.
The tennis over the past fortnight has ensured the men’s world number one has not been missed and for me anyway, the cherry on top would be a Rafa Nadal victory today.
Were the Spaniard to win, and move past Djokovic and Roger Federer onto 21 grand slam titles, it would perhaps be the greatest achievement the sport has ever seen.
For a 35-year-old who has admitted that as recently as a few months ago he was unsure he would ever be back on the tour, his comeback has been a joy to watch.
With all the talk of Djokovic potentially reaching number 21, and the possibility of one last flash of brilliant from Federer at some point to nudge him onto 21, Nadal has been somewhat forgotten.
In the build-up to this year’s tournament in Melbourne, few experts, if any, picked the clay specialist for the title, even after Djokovic’s deportation.
A Nadal win would not only be one for the history books, it would also be a victory for sportsmanship, with his conduct in stark contrast to that of Djokovic’s.
For anyone looking for a sporting role model, you couldn’t do better than Nadal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here