Burning Down the House
Ian Pattison
Available on Amazon by order or on Amazon Kindle
Review by Brian Beacom
To say Ian Pattison’s new novel (set slightly in the future) is ambitious is rather like saying Nicola Sturgeon quite fancies a wee shot at becoming president of an independent Scotland. The writer who once chronicled the wonderfully chaotic, comedic life of Rab C Nesbitt, has now sought to meld the subject of post Scottish independence schisms with the experiences of Ireland in 1922, a collapsed personal relationship – and an emotional meltdown.
Oh, and just for good measure, the ghost of Michael Collins becomes his roomie.
How do we enter this slightly dystopian world? Ivan is a writer who lives in Glasgow’s west end and once enjoyed a successful stint in television writing but has to adjust to the fact that television wants a younger/cheaper/more compliant version of himself.
Ivan is also bonkers in love with Emily but has in fact made himself single because he “self-sabotaged” his relationship. How? Easy if you try. Having failed to request her hand in marriage after crossing the two-three-year togetherness threshold, Ivan took her off on holiday, not to the beautiful Bosphorus as promised, but to wet, dreary Cork.
What was he thinking of? It transpires that Ivan wrote a recent play about Irish revolutionary Michael Collins and remains obsessed with the man, choosing to visit the places Collins’s convoy travelled to on the day of his death in 1922. Needless to say, it wasn’t just Emily’s wool coat that became damp.
The starting point for visiting the life of Ivan the terrible lover however is a self-inflicted boating accident. The writer finds himself concussed in hospital, and then evaluated. “‘The psychiatrist would like to see you.’ She studies my notes. ‘It says here you write for a living.’ ‘No, I write to stay sane.’ ‘It doesn’t appear to be working.’ ‘I’ll be the judge of that.’”
On leaving hospital, Ivan’s obsessions with Irish independence, the politics of liberation and unity mount. Meanwhile, he wonders if he can reunite with Emily. Both feelings, we appreciate, are tied at the ankle by a stretchy schoolboys’ snake belt, which results in him running a shoogly, three-legged race towards an unmarked finish line.
Just to add to the angst, the writer hopes to write a documentary comparing the post-independence experiences of Ireland and Scotland embracing Republican and Unionist standpoints. But the TV company wants less James Connolly and more Billy Connolly.
And then the ghost appears. Michael Collins. While Ivan argues for the right to write about the complexities of independence, he can’t get “Mick” out of his head. The pair feud. They fight. They become friends. (Sort of).
Yet, the relationship between the man who was assassinated by a fellow revolutionary and the obsessed writer is utterly compelling, as dark as a sniper’s balaclava – and very funny.
At one point, the pair compare the price of a modern coffee and slice of cake (“four quid”) with the cost of revolutionary bullets in 1922. Collins suggests: “In the War of Independence the price of a bullet was what, three pence? At 240 pence to the pound, there’s 320 British soldiers you could have shot back then for the price of a coffee and a bit of cake.”
Pattison has not only written a (partly autobiographical?) book about a confused character re-evaluating his life (the scales are brought out to weigh up what’s been achieved so far); it’s also a searing, and very funny tale about how we can move forward on reaching a certain age.
It’s about a sense of being thwarted, it’s about seizing moments. It’s about accepting the ghosts in our heads are there for a reason. And treating them to coffee and cake.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here