CAMPAIGNERS trying to save a former Glasgow school fear it could be left to further decay due to a delay in proposals being heard by the city council.
The Sir John Maxwell school in the city’s south side has lain empty for the past 12 years and is in need of urgent repairs before an alternative use for the site can go ahead.
At a meeting of Glasgow City Council City Administration in June a decision on whether to demolish or carry out repair work to the Christian Street school was postponed to allow officers to engage with campaigners. It would cost £270,000 to demolish and £830,000 to carry out repairs.
Read more: Glasgow campaign group in bid to save historic school gifted by Maxwell family
The Sir John Maxwell School Trust has ambitious plans to convert the building into a £6.3million environmental hub and prepared a full report which they understood would be heard at a meeting later this month. However, the trust has now been told that the matter won’t be brought back to the council until next May.
A spokesman for the trust said: “The City Administration in June postponed a decision on repairing the roof of the school and asked officers to work with the trust to develop the idea of an Environmental Learning Centre plus workspaces.
“We produced a 20 page report with detailed costings in September and forwarded it to the council. This shows how the project can be a major contributor to Glasgow’s environmental objectives.
“We understood that a recommendation of some sort it would go to the next Committee on November 18. However, we have been informed that the officers do not propose to do this but postpone any consideration until after the May 2022 elections.”
Trust members are concerned the delay will result in further deterioration of the building, possibly putting it in jeopardy beyond saving.
Their plans include retro-fitting the school to accommodate activities which address Glasgow’s and Scotland’s 21st century challenges by a combination of an Environmental Demonstration and Learning Centre and related workspaces.
A key objective will be to demonstrate and promote the principles and techniques of sustainable reuse at every step of the project design and retro-fitting process.
This will cover new heating and energy systems, materials reuse, reducing waste, sustainable food production and consumption and a model ecoflat/ecohouse.
In their report to the council they added: “The adjacent Pollok Park will be used for outdoor learning experiences such as understanding the carbon absorption of trees. No other available building in Glasgow has this locational advantage. As a visitor attraction it will complement the Pollok Stables project and the Burrell Collection.”
Their project would cost £6.3m after roof repairs while demolition and new build would be £7.2m.
The trust has also taken into account the environmental impact on whether the building is saved or demolished. They say studies show that demolition and new build rather than retro-fit releases 2.5 times more captured carbon and it wastes materials and believe retro-fitting is the best course of action in this case.
The spokesman added: “We accept that a further independent viability study is needed but think that this should be commissioned now to avoid a wasted year. We have stated that if such an independent study concludes that no options for retro-fit are viable then we will accept the result. After all the work that has gone in this is a disappointing impasse and we hope the council will reconsider.”
The school was named after Sir John Stirling Maxwell, the Glasgow laird whose family owned much of the land that the south side was built on and gifted the grounds of Old Pollok estate to the city which became Pollok Country Park.
Boarded up and cordoned off to the public, a partial roof collapse in March has left the future of the building uncertain.
Read more: Glasgow Cathedral opens its doors to the world for COP26 as neon artwork is revealed
Built between 1906 to 1907, the Maxwell family paid for the school which opened in 1909. However, it closed in 2011 as part of the overall development of the education estate of the council and pupils moving into more modern schools.
A spokesman for Glasgow City Council said: “We will continue to make the building safe through physical interventions before further consideration is given and a decision made on the future of the former school.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here