Have pregnant women been neglected as an at-risk group during the pandemic?
Statistics this week from both Scotland and England have highlighted concerns over the numbers of unvaccinated mothers-to-be ending up in critical care, particularly since the Delta strain became dominant.
Yet despite growing evidence about the dangers posed by Covid during pregnancy - including increased risks of miscarriage and stillbirth - expectant mothers are not, and never have been, prioritised for vaccination.
Instead, mixed messages have fuelled uncertainty over the vaccines' safety, with mothers-to-be initially advised not to get it due to a lack of clinical trial data (pregnant women, understandably, having been excluded as participants).
Yet even after official guidance changed in April, making clear the vaccines were safe, effective and should be offered to women at any stage of pregnancy, reports surfaced on social media of women being given contradictory information, often by midwives, ranging from vague and non-committal "we can't advise you what to do" to cautions that they should delay.
One mother - who wanted the jag - told the iPaper in July that her midwife had urged her "not to be a guinea pig", while another said she had caught Covid after being told "not to risk the vaccine".
The consequences of this confusion are crystal clear in figures showing uptake rates which are around a third of that compared to the general population of the same age.
READ MORE: One in four intensive care Covid patients under-40 in third wave
In Scotland, two separate reports published over the past ten days have shed some light on the patterns of Covid infection and serious illness among pregnant women and those who had recently given birth.
For instance, we now know for the first time - thanks to a Public Health Scotland (PHS) report - that a total of 4,248 cases of Covid were detected in pregnancies between March 1 and August 31.
Meanwhile, analysis by the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group (SICSAG) has revealed that between March 1 and September 19 a total of 67 women were admitted to intensive care with Covid who were either pregnant on admission (70 per cent) or had given birth in the six weeks prior (30%).
From this it is possible to conclude that roughly 1.6% of expectant and new mothers who contracted Covid in Scotland have ended up in ICU (with the caveats that many asymptomatic infections go undetected; community testing availability is much higher now than earlier in the pandemic; and that not all patients who have tested positive for the coronavirus are necessarily in hospital for that reason).
However, given that these caveats apply to everyone - not just pregnant women - how do these figures compare to the general population?
Well, according to PHS there have been 155,831 confirmed cases and 213 ICU admissions to date in females aged 15 to 44.
On that basis, the infection to intensive care conversion among young women in general is approximately 0.14% - a tenth of the rate compared to those linked to pregnancies.
Another cause for concern is how the pattern of ICU admissions has changed for pregnant women over time.
In the course of the first two waves combined - covering the period from March 1 2020 to May 17 2021 - a total of 25 pregnant, or recently pregnant, women were admitted to ICU with Covid out of a total of 630 female Covid admissions. In other words, just 4% were classed as 'obstetric' patients.
In the third wave, from May 18 to September 19, there were 189 female ICU admissions with Covid, but this time 42 of them - 22% - were obstetric patients.
None of these 42 women had been vaccinated, even with a single dose, despite appointments having opened to 30 to 39-year-olds in early May and 18 to 29-year-olds in late May.
READ MORE: What Israel tells us about boosters, waning immunity and Covid deaths
Uptake has been "substantially lower", as PHS put it, among pregnant women compared to the general population: of all the women who gave birth in August, just 25% had had a single vaccination compared, at the time, to around 80% of 30 to 39-year-olds and more than 70% of 18 to 29-year-olds.
Some evidence from around the world has also pointed to increasingly severe illness in pregnant women as the virus has mutated - a pattern which appears to be borne out by the data in Scotland where the Alpha variant dominated during wave two before being overtaken by Delta in wave three.
As SICSAG notes there "were very few critical care admissions" for obstetric patients during wave one - very probably fewer than five, in fact.
By wave three, however, Scotland had seen "increased numbers of pregnant women being admitted to hospital with moderate to severe Covid-19 symptoms requiring critical care".
Of these wave three mothers, 17% were of non-white ethnicity (in a Scottish population where 96% of people are white) and 34% came from the most deprived areas.
Groups, coincidentally, known to have lower vaccine coverage.
On Monday, data for England revealed 20 of the 118 most critically ill Covid patients given extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (Ecmo) between July and September were mothers-to-be, of whom 19 were unvaccinated and one had had a single dose.
ECMO is administered when a patient's lungs are so badly damaged that a ventilator cannot maintain oxygen levels.
READ MORE: Almost 400 fully-vaccinated Scots died from Covid after restrictions lifted
According to Dr Sarah Stock, a consultant in maternal and foetal medicine who is co-leading a study into Covid-19 in pregnancy at Edinburgh University, being pregnant affects how the body responds to infections and "this is probably what we're seeing with Covid-19".
Thankfully, no pregnant women in Scotland have died from Covid.
But it seems clear that they have been let down by a toxic combination of confusion and misinformation which has understandably increased their hesitancy and left them under-protected as Delta - combined with a lifting of restrictions - fuelled a surge in infections over summer.
At the very least, much more needs to be done now to drive up coverage among expectant mothers, particularly as winter - and flu season - approaches.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel