Mike Ashley’s attempts to sell Newcastle finally ended on Thursday as the club’s fans received the announcement they have craved for so long.
News of a resolution in a row over alleged TV piracy in Saudi Arabia on Wednesday opened the door for the takeover, which had become embroiled in a legal wrangle, to come to a head.
Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the long-running saga.
How long has Ashley been trying to sell?
In all honesty, for much of the time since he bought the club in April 2007. He first put it up for sale amid a furious backlash from supporters in the wake of Kevin Keegan’s departure as manager in September 2008, and then again after relegation from the Premier League at the end of that season. He was unable to find a credible buyer on either occasion and formally removed the Magpies from the market in 2009 after Chris Hughton had steered them back into the top flight. In effect, however, he has been open to offers ever since and has been looking for a buyer in earnest since 2017 after admitting he was not rich enough to compete with the likes of Manchester City and Chelsea.
Who is he selling to?
Amanda Staveley first tried to buy Newcastle in 2017 (Owen Humphreys/PA)
Amanda Staveley’s PCP Capital Partners first tried to buy Newcastle for around £250million in 2017, but Ashley pulled the plug three months after she had initially declared an interest with no deal in place, describing the process as “a complete waste of time”. The financier, however, refused to take no for an answer and in April last year, a consortium comprising Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) as 80 per cent majority shareholder, PCP and the Reuben Brothers reached agreement on a £340m deal, although it is understood the price has since been renegotiated down. However, after waiting 17 weeks in vain for the Premier League to come to a decision under its owners’ and directors’ test, the consortium withdrew its offer in July 2020.
What was the Premier League’s issue?
Premier League chief executive Richard Masters (Mike Egerton/PA)
The governing body had two main problems with the proposed deal: Saudi Arabia’s ban on broadcaster beIN SPORTS, its rights-holder in the region, and the matter of separation between PIF and the state. The consortium, despite its best efforts, was unable to prove to the satisfaction of the league that the PIF and the state were separate entities, and with beIN accusing Saudi Arabia of piracy, that was a major problem. In addition, Amnesty International has drawn attention to the country’s human rights record.
How did Ashley take that?
Mike Ashley launched a two-pronged legal attack in a bid to push the takeover through (PA)
Not well, to say the least. The billionaire sportswear magnate vowed to take his fight to the courts, launching arbitration and competition cases claiming that the Premier League had not implemented its own rules correctly, and that rival clubs had moved to block the takeover. He considered the deal to be done and both parties have since indicated a continued willingness to do business.
How has the impasse been resolved?
The Premier League appears to have been convinced of the separation between the Saudi state and PIF (Richard Sellers/PA)
Assurances have been made over the separation of the Saudi state and PIF, which appears to have been the overriding issue. Negotiations are understood to have been ongoing for some time and Wednesday’s development was a consequence of the progress made. A Premier League statement on Thursday read: “The Premier League has now received legally binding assurances that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia will not control Newcastle United Football Club.”
What happens if those assurances are broken?
Following the completion of the Premier League’s Owners’ and Directors’ Test, the club has been sold to the consortium with immediate effect.
Full statement: https://t.co/j2B1xaN1ej pic.twitter.com/IJbtU7lTSs
— Premier League Communications (@PLComms) October 7, 2021
PA understands that the Premier League is comfortable with the new ownership structure, despite the closeness of PIF to the Saudi government. The PIF says on its own website that it “acts as the Kingdom’s main investment arm to deliver a strategy focused on achieving attractive financial returns and long-term value for Saudi Arabia”. It is understood that if any direct involvement from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia became apparent, it would constitute a breach of Premier League rules and could lead to the owners being disqualified.
How will it go down on Tyneside?
Newcastle fans celebrate following the announcement of the takeover (Owen Humphreys/PA)
Large sections of Newcastle’s fanbase have been in open revolt against Ashley for much of his tenure. Ashley has tried to make the club self-sufficient, but his relative lack of investment in the playing staff has seen their fortunes on the pitch slide into an annual battle for top-flight survival, which appears to be the only ambition. The club have not won a major trophy since 1955 and have been relegated twice during his ownership. Fans have been desperate to see the back of him and the prospect of wealthy new owners arriving at last has sparked feverish excitement in the city.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here