HEAVY smokers are more than six times as likely to die from a Covid infection compared to people who have never smoked, according to a major new study which challenges claims that cigarettes might offer a protective effect against the disease.
Researchers said there was a "need for greater clarity" about the relationship between smoking and severe Covid due to "conflicting evidence" which has even led to a clinical trial being established to investigate whether nicotine replacement patches can used as a prophylactic against the infection.
The study, published today in the BMJ journal Thorax, is the first to pool both observational and genetic data on Covid and smoking.
Scientists from Oxford University drew on primary care records and information about genetics and lifestyle stored on more than 421,000 people as part of the UK Biobank project.
READ MORE: How do virus, vaccine and hospital trends differ across the UK?
From this cohort, they were able to identify that 1,649 individuals had tested positive for Covid between January and August 2020, of whom 968 required hospital treatment and 444 died as a result of their infection.
The comparatively high ratio of hospitalisations and deaths to infections during this period reflects the way in which community testing was limited during the initial phase of the pandemic, with most PCR resources targeted to healthcare settings or care homes.
The researchers cross-referenced Covid outcomes against self-reported smoking status.
They found that 849 of the 1,649 infections had occurred in people who had never smoked, of whom 440 required hospital admission and 159 died.
Among the 57 who were current - as opposed to former smokers - there were 51 hospitalisations and around 40 deaths.
Once adjusting for variables including age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation and underlying health conditions, the researchers found that "heavy smoking" - 20 or more cigarettes per day - was associated with a six-fold increase in the risk of death from Covid compared to people who had never smoked.
Current smokers were also 80% more likely to be admitted to hospital.
READ MORE: The beginning of the end? The 'surprising' fall in Scotland's Covid cases
The researchers also found that a genetic predisposition to smoking was associated with a 45% higher risk of infection.
The findings follow a raft of "conflicting evidence" including one study conducted early in the pandemic which reported a lower prevalence of active smokers among Covid-19 patients relative to the general population, and another which found that smoking was associated with lower risks of Covid-19 mortality.
A clinical trial involving over 1,600 participants is currently underway in France comparing the spread and severity of the virus in groups given nicotine replacement patches compared to a placebo.
However, a number of other observational studies have since found links between smoking and an increased risk of infection, worse symptoms, and respiratory failure in lifetime smokers.
“The idea that tobacco smoking may protect against Covid-19 was always an improbable one,” write Dr Anthony Laverty and Dr Christopher Millet of Imperial College London, in a linked editorial.
“A respiratory pandemic should be the ideal moment to focus collective minds on tobacco control,” they add, highlighting a recent warning from the Royal College of Physicians that the UK will miss its target of cutting smoking prevalence to less than 5% by 2030.
READ MORE: Errors in vaccine passport leave Falkirk chemist £400 out of pocket
Lead researcher Dr Ashley Clift said: “Our results strongly suggest that smoking is related to your risk of getting severe Covid, and just as smoking affects your risk of heart disease, different cancers, and all those other conditions we know smoking is linked to, it appears that it’s the same for Covid.
"So now might be as good a time as any to quit cigarettes and quit smoking.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel