A leading charity for people with impaired vision has called an independent third-party review of a project designed to create more space for cyclists and pedestrians in our cities before they are made permanent.
The Royal National Institute for the Blind said changes made to footpaths, road, and segregated cycle lanes as temporary safety measures during the height of lockdown to help reduce the risk of covid transmission through the Scottish Government’s Spaces for People should be fully assessed.
Their comments came as Glasgow City Councillors debated the impact and speed of a recommendation to retain some measures which were introduced in 2020.
Read more: Covid Scotland: Glasgow installs new seating and decking to help boost spaces for people
The City Administration Committee yesterday voted in favour for the majority of Glasgow’s Spaces for People measures to become permanent.
Catriona Burness, RNIB Scotland policy manager, said: “We and other Scottish sight loss charities have sought assurance from the Scottish Government that there should be an independent third-party national review of Spaces for People before any changes are made permanent. This should take place before any decisions on permanent alterations are made. We have also raised concerns over pavement clutter and the increasing number of proposed floating bus stops and bus boarders alongside temporary cycleways.
“The covid pandemic has already had significant consequences for blind and partially sighted people and new street layout arrangements may effectively extend lockdown for them.”
Recommendations in a report to the committee that will now be taken forward include the permanent retention of all Spaces for People segregated cycle lanes which offer around 40km of additional dedicated cycling space; to keep footway widening measures and urban greening around George Square and Merchant City, as well as infrastructure that supports physical distancing around city centre transport hubs and bus stops, and the ‘People Friendly Streets’ measures at Dennistoun, Shawlands and Pollokshields East should be made permanent.
The removal of all footway widening measures within city neighbourhoods, except for the road closure and associated infrastructure on Kelvin was recommended.
More than 3,700 responses were received during a public consultation period on what should be retained.
Councillor Anna Richardson, City Convener for Sustainability and Carbon Reduction said: “These schemes were introduced at pace and at the height of the pandemic to support physical distancing however it’s clear that they have proved popular and if made permanent can offer longer-term strategic benefits to our transport network as well as being advantageous to our health and wellbeing, and to the environment."
Tory Councillor Kyle Thorton proposed to exclude a number of installations on account of a lack of local support saying that when the consultation data was broken down to a local level that seven pop up cycle lanes had majority support for their removal and claimed communities had been snubbed.
Labour group leader Councillor Malcolm Cunning said they were concerned about making temporary arrangements permanent before legitimate questions could be and called for the issue to be continued. However, following a vote it was agreed to proceed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel