I BELIEVE that the Cambo oilfield should continue to be developed.
I am all for taking measures that will slow climate change, but is there such a thing as a green motorised vehicle? Many will point to battery-driven versions as being green – but although they are cleaner, they are definitely not Green.
Unless every part of a vehicle is produced using renewable energy sources, there remains a large carbon footprint element to production – for example from extracting and smelting materials for the vehicle’s structure and battery, and the disposal of those batteries where there is a high corrosive and toxic element involved. There is also a carbon footprint in producing glass for all vehicles, as well as for commercial buildings and homes.
Even if we remove all vehicles from our roads and only public service vehicles and trains are used for travel and commerce, we would still need to develop the Cambo field for a number of very important reasons, not the least of which are the plastics needed to build the buses and trains, since even reverting to steel or aluminium is hugely energy-intensive.
We also need oil for transporting goods around the world by sea, for our cleaning products, medical procedures, personal care and treatment of and recovery from injuries.
Oil is also used in lipsticks, paint, paper, clothes, electrical wiring and what about computers, smart phones and tablets, and much more?
Oil is part of our lives in so many ways that we do not notice, but take for granted. Oil is not going away.
Francis Deigman, Erskine.
TURBINE IMPORTS ARE A DISGRACE
LIKE many I was dismayed but not surprised by the announcement that the wind turbine tower manufacturing facility at Campbeltown is finally to close ("Anger as key ‘green jobs revolution’ firm goes into insolvency", The Herald, September 9).
A few months past I made a Freedom of Information request to the Scottish Government asking how many of the onshore and offshore wind turbines greater than 2MW that are now operating in Scotland had any of the three main components of towers, blades and hubs manufactured in Scotland. The response was that the Government did not hold such information. A similar request to the industry trade body which strongly supports wind farm development in Scotland, Scottish Renewables, has produced no reply.
The answer to my query is of course that not a single one of the many thousands of wind turbines now operational in Scotland has been made in this country. All have had most, if not all, of the major parts imported from other countries. These imports continue, as anyone viewing the blades and towers regularly unloaded at Glasgow's docks can see.
Why have successive Scottish Governments so lamentably failed to effectively address this deficiency? England has seen the need to develop a home industry with turbine components today being constructed at major factories on Humberside and the Isle of Wight. The facility at Hull is owned by Siemens, one of the three major suppliers to Scottish onshore and offshore wind farms. Siemens has recently announced a major expansion which will double the number of skilled jobs. So much for the claim by the South Korean owner of the Campbeltown site that its closure has been caused by deteriorating market conditions.
No doubt the Scottish Government will be boasting at the forthcoming climate change conference in Glasgow about how much of Scotland's electricity comes from the wind. Hopefully others will be drawing attention to the disgraceful inability of the Government to secure and sustain the necessary manufacturing capability.
John Riddell, Fairlie.
LITTER PROBLEM IS WIDESPREAD
THERE has been much talk about the messy streets in Glasgow. Bt it's not just Glasgow; we have a problem in Islay too. Of course the Government and the council are blamed, but if people did not make the mess there would be no problem. I am always shocked and surprised at the casual dropping of litter. If people can carry a full coffee cup or sandwich packet, why can’t they cope with the detritus? Where is their self-respect and sense of pride in their surroundings?
Dorothy Dennis, Port Ellen, Islay.
MOVE ON FROM LAZY LANGUAGE
ACCORDING to Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross, “businesses are being chucked under the bus” as a result of the SNP’s plans for vaccine passports ("Scotland’s vaccine passports to start on October 1", The Herald, September 10).
Indeed a day rarely passes without some Right Honourable Member accusing another of the urban equivalent of sweeping rubbish under the carpet.
No wonder our city streets are filthy if this the case.
I think it is time to draw a line in the sand and move on. This lazy, tired phraseology is no longer fit for purpose and should be consigned to be recycled at a language-fill site for dull, unimaginative expression.
Duncan Graham, Stirling.
WHERE FERRY DREAMS COME TRUE?
ROBIN M Brown (Letters, September 10) calls for suggestions for names for Hull 802, currently languishing at the Ferguson Marine yard. With the Mickey Mouse debacle around the project, I suggest Steamboat Willie, courtesy of The Walt Disney Company.
The Donald Duck and Goofy seem a bit infra dig for dignified Caledonian MacBrayne.
R Russell Smith, Largs.
* IN response to Robin M Brown’s inspired invitation, I offer the following suggestions:
Hull Hath No Ferry; Hull Be Seeing You; Hullo Rerr.
Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel