CHILEAN winemaking has come a long way over the last 40 years, and even further since it first began way back in the 16th century. Yeah, the 16th century, folks, and we still refer to them as New World wines.
Chilean wineries have been telling the world their products are unique for decades and for once in the wine trade, it wasn't hype. Chile’s remoteness meant its vines were protected from the phylloxera bug that decimated European vineyards in the 19th century so their vines haven't been grafted with North American rootstock as per most of the rest of the world. Also, the climate, partly created by the cool air at night from the Andes, adds to the development of the grapes and increases the flavonoids.
Anyway, enough technical bull, all I know is that they have gone from exporting loads of three for a tenner merlots to creating some of the world's finest wines. It's true that they still thrive in the bargain basement, but who would have guessed in the 1980s that they would be producing wines such as the world class Casa Real a few decades later?
There's a silky richness to their reds and all the bordeaux varietals thrive there but, for most of us, it's their merlots and carmenere that still come out on top. Lately, though, I've been drawn to their whites, particularly their chardonnays which used to taste like someone had added vanilla flavour to battery acid. I've grown as fond of their unoaked chardonnays as their barrel fermented versions and that's saying something for me.
Follow me on Twitter @gerardfinewine
Emiliana Organic Chardonnay
A lovely hint of lime on the nose leads into a palate dominated by creamy, nutty flavours. It's got a really long finish as well which is usually the hallmark of a far more expensive wine.
Marks & Spencer £7
Lapostolle Grand Selection Merlot
Lapostolle have long been favourites of mine but even I was taken back by just how rich and smooth this was. Ripe red berries on the palate with creamy tannins and a lovely silky finish.
Winedelivered.co.uk £13.99
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here