The third episode of Vigil has been eagerly awaited by fans after the debut double bill left people on the edge of their seats.
The third instalment in the six part series is due to air on Sunday September 6, offering fans further insight into the goings-on at Dunloch naval base.
Following an early plot twist in the first episode, viewers have been unsure as to which members of the cast will feature in each episode.
There is a particular question mark over Martin Compston's character, with the promise of an appearance from the Scottish actor initially encouraging many people to tune in to the drama-thriller.
Here's what we know about the plot for episode 3 and whether Martin Compston will feature...
What is the plot for episode 3 of Vigil?
According to the BBC's plot summary of episode 3, the investigation will take Kirsten "to the heart of Scottish politics".
It reads: "Kirsten believes the murders were part of a coordinated attack. Her investigation takes her into the heart of Scottish politics and the naval cover-up of a near catastrophe in the US.
"Amy starts to question who she can trust on Vigil, when a message from Kirsten makes her realise she is being deliberately undermined."
Will Martin Compston feature in episode 3 of Vigil?
After an early plot twist, fans have been left wondering just how much Martin Comspton will appear in the show.
While we can't be certain of the answer, his name does appear in the credits for episode 3 which suggests he will make some sort of appearance, however big or small.
What is the cast line-up for Vigil?
Martin Compston is not the only famous face in Vigil.
Suranne Jones, famed for her lead role in Doctor Foster plays Amy Silva.
Aberdeen born Game of Thrones star Rose Leslie plays Kirsten Longacre, while Paterson Joseph of Noughts + Crosses plays Newsome.
Leslie's Game of Thrones colleague Stephen Dillane plays Shaw, with Adam James playing Prentice and Sex Education's Connor Swindells playing Hadlow.
Rounding off the cast is Shaun Evans as Glover.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here