THERE was a certain irony this week that on the day the Scottish Government unveiled its £1 billion NHS Recovery Plan, NHS Lanarkshire announced that it was cancelling the majority of its non-urgent elective surgery for the next couple of weeks.
Dr John Keaney, the health board's acute medical director, said its staff were "struggling to cope" with the "relentless pressures, bed shortages and staff shortages due to sickness, stress and self-isolation".
READ MORE: Scotland's Covid infections rising 10 times faster than in England
The five-year Recovery Plan also came on the day that Scotland reported a (then) record-breaking 5,021 Covid infections in a single day and after emergency departments' performance against the waiting time target fell to an all-time low.
In the week ending August 15, just 76 per cent of the 25,461 patients attending A&E were seen and subsequently discharged, transferred or admitted within four hours.
Pre-pandemic, the worst turnaround rate was 77.8% - and that was in the first week of January 2018.
The summer months traditionally are the busiest for A&E departments: the weekly average for August in the four years before 2020 was nearly 26,600 attendances.
But under normal circumstances, few of those patients will require an urgent admission to hospital and, if they do, bed availability is generally much better than it is in winter.
This August is different.
In the week ending August 15, 239 patients spent at least 12 hours in A&E compared to a pre-pandemic weekly average of 31, and a pre-pandemic weekly average for January of 99.
Before Covid, many of these patients might have ended up stranded for hours on a trolley in the A&E corridor; now strict infection control means that they must remain in an A&E bed, while less urgent patients are left waiting in ambulances 'stacked' outside, with knock-on delays for other 999 callers.
READ MORE: If Covid cases are on the rise again and even fully vaccinated people can spread it - what's Plan B?
On top of all this, physical distancing means that total hospital capacity is reduced at a time when an increasing proportion of patients are presenting in primary care as well as A&E with chronic conditions, such as diabetes, which have deteriorated during the pandemic, or undiagnosed late-stage cancers.
This results in the slew of urgent, non-Covid admissions which is leaving so many of those waiting for hip replacements and other planned procedures in limbo.
Emergency departments have always been a gauge for the NHS as a whole - simultaneously conveying the levels of pressure within hospitals (staff and bed shortages, demand for diagnostic services such CT scans and endoscopy) as well as the wider community.
Even before the pandemic, years of disinvestment in general practice had triggered a recruitment and retention crisis which had left patients in some areas struggling to get timely GP appointments and turning up at A&E instead; now a reduction in the number of face-to-face appointments which can be safely provided without risking an outbreak of Covid in the waiting room is exacerbating that problem, even as the total number of consultations GPs are actually providing (by telephone, video etc) has ballooned well beyond pre-pandemic levels in most surgeries.
On this, the Recovery Plan states only that it will "urgently seek to fully restore face to face consultations in GP surgeries", adding that Public Health Scotland will "imminently publish updated guidance for primary care settings covering key issues such as physical distancing requirements, access for patients and infection prevention control".
Given spiralling coronavirus rates, evidence of waning vaccine immunity, and the fact that the Delta variant increases the chances of even fully vaccinated individuals contracting and spreading the virus, this will be challenging.
The plan also states that Scotland is "on track" to increase the GP workforce by 800 by 2026, but that depends on how you frame it.
By headcount, the GP workforce has grown from 4,918 in 2017 - when this pledge was first made - to 5,134 in 2020.
But that misses the impact of the growing percentage of GPs working part-time.
Counted as 'whole-time equivalent', the GP workforce has been in decline - down by around 160, to 3,575, between 2013 and 2017, the most recent year for which a WTE figure is available.
Audit Scotland, who warned of the trend in its August 2019 workforce report, noted that GPs in their 50s were more likely to be working full-time, while those aged 25 to 49 tended to be doing four to seven sessions per week ('full-time' is at least eight).
This pattern, said Audit Scotland, was "likely to mean that for every GP that retires more than one will need to be trained and recruited to replace them".
Given that a third of Scotland's GPs are in their 50s, this retirement timebomb poses a very serious problem - particularly with medical early retirements expected to surge post-Covid.
The Recovery Plan also outlines a vision of easing workload pressure on GPs by bolstering practices with community nurses, pharmacists, and mental health links workers, but that dates from the 2018 Scottish GP contract and, even before Covid, health boards (who will be responsible for employing these staff even if they are based in GP practices) were failing to supply them in the numbers required, either because they simply didn't exist or because deploying them into primary care would leave a shortfall elsewhere.
Most of the Recovery Plan's goals will rely on manpower, from the promised 55,000 extra (compared to pre-pandemic levels) inpatient and day case procedures by 2026, to the network of National Treatment Centres delivering orthopaedics and other elective surgery.
Procuring additional CT pods, mobile MRI scanners, and endoscopy equipment will not achieve the promised 90,000 extra diagnostic procedures unless we have the staff to operate them - and even before Covid diagnostic pathways were buckling under staffing shortages.
As Andy Glyde, of Cancer Research UK in Scotland, noted: “What’s important now is the detail of how this recovery plan will be delivered."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel