Something Out Of Place: Women And Disgust
Eimear McBride
Wellcome Collection, £9.99
Review by Vicky Allan
Novelist Eimear McBride, whose fictional account of Irish girlhood, A Girl Is A Half-Formed Thing, won the Women’s Prize, has made a first foray into non-fiction, writing a short polemic that touches on issues of women’s objectification and oppression, chiefly through the prism of disgust.
Its final pages are a postscript written following the Sarah Everard murder. We might not immediately think of the word "disgust" when we think of that recent horror, or the reaction to it, but McBride makes the connection – she has in essence already made it over 160 pages – between the violence women are subjected to, the fear they live in and a particular understanding of disgust.
She observes: “Misogyny has always been the most socially acceptable hatred … Men who murder out of it are not viewed as representatives of a deep-seated, institutional blindness to the essential humanity, rights of and wellbeing of women. They are excused and explained away as weirdos and anomalies. Their hatred of women, their desire to do harm to their bodies, either physically or sexually is not taken seriously. It’s not even seen as hatred, and most often is considered to have been provoked in the first place.”
The disgust her book focuses on is more than just the terror we might feel around the consumption of pathogens. It is an “awareness of being defiled”. Why have we seen this disgust so strongly applied to women and their bodies?
To understand this, McBride looks at something commonly looked at with disgust: dirt. She quotes British anthropologist Mary Douglas, who in her book Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, wrote: “If we can abstract pathogenicity and hygiene from our notion of dirt, we are left with the old definition of dirt as matter out of place.”
Just as dirt is "matter out of place", so are women who speak out, or fail to conform to the stereotypes set out for them.
It often feels as if McBride’s big thoughts and rangy sentences need more space to breathe. She roams over multiple current feminist issues from #MeToo to pornography, but where she is at her best is talking about this visceral aspect.
I was attracted to Something Out Of Place because it’s my own view that disgust of almost all types is to be resisted. Prior to reading it, I might have said that I don’t have a strong sense of disgust to resist.
But McBride’s polemic reminded me of the ways in which the absorbed disgust directed at women still lives in me. As McBride writes: “The disgust I have been writing about, which has been so successfully deployed in the war against women, making and naming our own places in the world, has succeeded in surrounding us and even managed to creep inside of us.”
I would have liked McBride to go further and deeper into this visceral subject, to dig around more in that dirt, because it’s this aspect that makes her book distinct as a feminist polemic.
I would also have liked her to look at what this “something out of place” might bring to our understanding of the toxic debate around trans rights, since both cis women and trans people of all gender identities, might be regarded as to greater or lesser degrees "out of place".
But, those issues aside, this is an invigorating call to refuse the disgust directed at women at every turn. It’s also a reminder that it’s not about you, it’s the system, an aspect of patriarchy and a whole way of thinking that treats us women as this matter out of place – and that can only arm and strengthen us all.
Eimear McBride will be talking about her new book at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on Thursday (August 26) https://www.edbookfest.co.uk/the-festival/whats-on/eimear-mcbride-disgust
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here