MORE than 200 beavers have been culled in Scotland since they became a protected species.
New data shows that since beavers became a European Protected Species on May 1, 2019, some 202 have been subject of licensed killing.
Some 115 were culled in 2020 on top of 87 that were shot between May 1 and the end of 2019.
Highlands-based Trees for Life says NatureScot, the government conservation agency, is breaking the law by issuing lethal control licenses without exploring all other options.
It comes as NatureScot said beaver numbers have doubled in the past three years.
A survey by NatureScot, the government conservation agency, estimates 1,000 beavers now live in the wild, reaching rivers north of Dundee in the east, westwards to Crianlarich, north of Loch Lomond, and south to Stirling on the river Forth.
Describing it as a "rapid expansion" they believe the expansion is likely to reach into Loch Lomond in the future.
The largest of its kind so far in the UK, the survey confirmed beavers had established 251 territories, more than double (120%) those found three years ago. One northerly population in Glen Isla, Angus, is close to the southern border of the Cairngorms national park.
Using canoes and field surveys, researchers found 13,204 confirmed signs of activity, including burrows, dams, lodges, scent mounds, canal digging and tree feeding. There were signs of beavers near Drymen, next to Loch Lomond, but no evidence they had settled there.
READ MORE: Farmers and landowners unite with ministers to fight court challenge over Scots beaver cull policy
NatureScot said the findings were a conservation success but the agency came under heavy criticism after over the numbers that were killed last year under licence, to protect farms, woodland and infrastructure.
Another 31 were trapped and relocated to official reintroduction sites in England and Wales. That is on top of the 83 beaver dams that were removed, with 15 animals live-trapped and translocated between May and December of 2019.
Beavers have been called “ecosystem engineers” for their incredible construction skills and are seen as a potential solution to flooding and wetland loss.
Trees for Life is seeking to curb the legal deaths through a judical review in court.
Its legal action argues that ministers and the nature agency are failing to make the killing of beavers as a "genuine last resort" when the species needs to be managed.
The rewilding charity accused NatureScot of suppressing this data when the charity launched legal action over its beaver culling policy last year. Trees for Life is waiting for a judge to rule on whether NatureScot’s policy on lethal control is lawful, after a two-day judicial review hearing in June.
Alan McDonnell, the charity’s conservation director, said: “NatureScot has sat on this grim tally since December, refusing to confirm it until today’s bid to hide the figures behind a welcome turn of events for the overall beaver population. This is such a waste of life and opportunity when nature is in crisis.”
Both the National Farmers Union and the landowners’ lobby group Scottish Land & Estates (SLE) raised £100,000 to make official legal representations and join forces with Scottish ministers and NatureScot to fight the beaver cull challenge.
The NFU argued that if Trees for Life succeed it will set a precedent over future species management and could "limit options to avoid serious agricultural damage."
Robbie Kernahan, NatureScot’s head of sustainable growth, said: “Beavers are nature’s supreme water engineers, but we know they may cause severe problems in some areas, particularly for crops on prime agricultural land and for important infrastructure like road drains or railway lines.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel