Monument Maker
David Keenan
White Rabbit, £25
Review by Nick Major
Scottish novelist David Keenan’s debut novel, This is Memorial Device, was about a 1980s cult band in Keenan’s home town of Airdrie. It was also “An Hallucinated Oral History of the Post-Punk Scene in Airdrie, Coatbridge and Environs, 1978 1986”. The operative word here being “hallucinated”: Keenan is fascinated with the occult. His second, For the Good Times, was about a jailed IRA foot soldier who recounts his time doing grubby jobs for a gang in 1970s Belfast. Last year, he published Xstabeth, about a Russian family changed by a cosmic force that pays them a visit. Monument Maker was – supposedly – written over 10 years. What is it about? After dragging myself through 800 tortuous, baffling, but occasionally enjoyable, pages, I’m not entirely sure.
The novel is divided into sections named after aspects of a cathedral: transept, nave, apse, sedilia. Within these sections Keenan uses a variety of voices, writing styles and forms, from first-person narration to transcripts of interviews and even an appendix that is a science fiction novel translated from the French by David Keenan. This jumble is further complicated by the fact that stories interpenetrate other stories within and outwith the novel (Xstabeth, for instance, turns up near the end) and narrative voices that sound like one another. The time frame also leaps about between present, past (the siege of Khartoum, for example), and the future (an astronaut in 2099).
As far as I can tell, the bulk of the novel centres on an “initiatory cult” called the Church of the First Stone of Silent Witness. The cult is formed by a sculptor called Pierre Melville, Maximilian Rehberg, a drug addict and quack philosopher, and Frater Jim, a disfigured Second World War veteran. These founders bring together “diverse weirdos from across the world” who are dedicated to “literary and historical subterranea”.
Their manifesto, Two Way Mirror, is translated by one of Keenan’s narrators, a nameless Scottish man, who also spends a great deal of time recounting a sordid summer love affair with a woman called Flower, whom he met whilst touring the cathedrals of Ile de France.
Keenan hasn’t really got much sense of pacing or scene craft; most of his writing is a kind of rambling discourse, sometimes of a pseudo-philosophical nature. He seems particularly interested in the relationship between art and life, along the lines of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 18, where the artwork preserves the object of the poet’s love. Here, for instance, is the nameless Scottish narrator:
“I intend that this book should be as a mausoleum for the two of us, and the state of our bodies, guesswork, now, buried, still entwined in each other, our very bones confused, our skulls fused in some unimaginable cataclysmic attempt at ultimate union, which is what sculpture is, which is what these language marks, carved into white by a pressure in my brain that I know can only find release in the idea of being caught up in something eternal …”
It goes on like this. Monument Maker is at least, well, original. Most contemporary fiction is insipid and formulaic; I’d rather read a confused novel like this one than something I’ve read hundreds of times before. So, Keenan deserves due credit for his ambition and fearlessness. But this doesn’t mean Monument Maker is a good book.
Keenan’s main problem is a lack of control. Ironically, one of his characters is a sculptor, a craft that requires the removal of a great amount of material to unveil a hidden form. Keenan, likewise, should have shelved pages of this book. There is an interesting novel somewhere here. It’s just difficult to find. Then again, perhaps that’s the point. Occult novels tend to be wild, messy and obscure. Give readers too much clarity, and they might see it’s all smoke and mirrors.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here