THE true scale of Covid infections in Scotland is probably being under-reported by official figures according to a report which warns that virus prevalence in recent wastewater sampling “significantly exceeded levels suggested by case rates”.
Nicola Sturgeon spoke of her cautious optimism in the run-up to Scotland entering Level Zero amid signs that cases had peaked and were “levelling off” or declining following record-breaking infection levels.
In the week ending July 4, Scotland reported 24,181 confirmed Covid cases – the highest at any point in the pandemic – but since then there has been a steady decrease, with 14,814 infections detected through laboratory testing in the past seven days.
However, epidemiologists who advise the Scottish Government caution that this decline is not being reflected in other forms of surveillance.
READ MORE: Vaccine Slowdown: What more can - and should - we do to boost uptake in young people
Writing in their latest ‘Modelling the Epidemic’ report, they note that higher than expected levels of coronavirus have been picked up during random testing of household sewage samples from across Scotland up to July 9.
They state: “Overall, wastewater Covid-19 levels continued to rise rapidly in the last week, reaching the highest levels observed.
"Increases are seen in a broad range of local authorities. Unlike recent weeks, wastewater Covid-19 values significantly exceeded levels suggested by case rates.”
They warn that wastewater samples analysed at Hatton, which covers the Dundee area, “in the last week rose to extremely high levels, substantially higher than in January", adding: “While this displays a large amount of variability, this shows a clear departure from case trends and represents the highest levels recorded in a major site.”
Yet according to Public Health Scotland data - based only on positive tests - the weekly incidence of Covid in Dundee more than halved from 899 cases per 100,000 residents as of July 2 to 392 per 100,000 by July 16.
READ MORE: Netherlands' virus explosion should be a warning against trying to rush our way out of Covid
The discrepancy is mirrored by community surveillance by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which estimated that one in 90 people in Scotland were infected with Covid in the week ending July 10 - up from one in every 100 people in the week to June 3.
This was despite official data recording a 19% week-on-week decrease in laboratory confirmed cases, from 24,094 to 19,468.
Similar patterns have also been seen in England, leading to speculation that people are becoming reluctant to get tested even if they do have symptoms because they do not want to self-isolate during the summer and as more activities become available.
The ONS survey is based on swabs from thousands of households across the UK and is considered a better gauge of true virus prevalence because it detects asymptomatic cases which would otherwise be missed.
READ MORE: Why we need to talk about Covid
Speaking over the weekend, Jillian Evans, head of public health intelligence at NHS Grampian, said: "Although we're looking at daily case numbers, if you look at the ONS infection survey we still have something like one in 90 people infected in Scotland, or reported to be, and other signals like wastewater.
"That's not something we often talk about but they're really important and we're seeing a complete divergence in the signals of infections and infection rates in communities that aren't consistent with the number of positive tests.
"That suggests to me that we're not detecting as many cases as there are out there, and that's a worry because people will still become sick, they will still pass the virus on, some people may still end up in hospital.
"Just looking at case numbers is not enough to understand what's going on at the moment."
The Modelling the Epidemic report also warned that Scotland could reach 30,000 Covid cases a day and nearly 900 patients in hospital with Covid by August 3 - compared to 536 now - under a worse case scenario which "assumes that behaviour changes instantaneously after the whole of Scotland moves to Level Zero on July 19".
However they noted that there is "uncertainty as to whether infections will increase or remain level in coming weeks".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel