SCOTS consumers back plans for net-zero emissions by 2045 but are “in the dark” over taking action in their own lives despite high-profile campaigns, new research has found.
It was found in a Citizens Advice Scotland (CAS) study that 65 per cent had no identifiable energy-efficiency measures or renewable technologies installed in their home, a Citizens Advice Scotland study has found.
Research for the charity by YouGov found that 68% of Scottish adults supported moves towards net zero by 2045, with 41% believing that reducing the impact of climate change should become more of a priority for the Scottish Government moving beyond Covid.
And 59% thought making homes more energy efficient should be prioritised in the Government’s climate response.
But only 17% believed that reducing water usage should be a priority, despite the fact that heating water accounts for 5% of UK carbon emissions – the same amount as the aviation industry.
And 90% were not aware most homes and businesses would need to replace their gas heating systems with an alternative source of heating, such as heat pumps, if Scotland were to reduce its reliance on “blue” hydrogen to meet climate change commitments.
Blue hydrogen is created from fossil fuels, with the carbon emissions captured and stored. Green hydrogen is made from non-fossil sources.
People across Scotland have been urged to help tackle the climate emergency ahead of COP26 in Glasgow later this year.
A major TV, radio and digital campaign called Let’s Do Net Zero has been launched to highlight the benefits a net-zero society would bring to the economy, health and the environment. It also aims to raise awareness of climate change and biodiversity loss.
The Scottish Government has set itself a legally-binding target to cut greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2045, five years ahead of the date set for the UK as a whole.
But in June it emerged it had again missed its target for reducing emissions. Figures for 2019 show they fell 51.5% against the baseline, well short of the 55% target.
CAS respondents were asked what might concern them if they were considering installing a low-carbon heating system.
Cost was the biggest concern, with 67% concerned about high up-front costs and 55% concerned about higher energy bills.
A majority of respondents said that non-repayable grants would encourage them to play their part in net zero, with 55% of people saying they would be encouraged to install low-carbon heating if they were offered a non-repayable grant that covered part of the cost.
Some 62% said it would encourage them to install energy-efficiency measures in their home generally.
Council tax rebates in the years following installation were also seen as measures that could be seen as encouraging consumers to switch to low-carbon heating systems.
CAS fair markets spokesman Kate Morrison said: “Later this year, the eyes of the world will be on Scotland as Glasgow hosts COP26, and this new briefing from Citizens Advice Scotland gives us a clear insight into how Scottish consumers view climate change.
“The good news is clear support for action towards net zero, and support for energy efficiency in people’s homes being made more of a priority.
“However, consumers are in the dark over the impact of net zero on their own lives, particularly when it comes to heating their homes.”
“Most people did not realise use of natural gas would have to be phased out or reduced massively, and would not pick low carbon heating systems as a measure they should take to reduce their carbon footprint.
“This really matters because changing to low-carbon heating will be essential if Scotland is to meet our emissions targets.”
The Government has a five-year, £62 million energy transition fund which has already provided £6.5m for a global underwater hub as well as £4.65m to Aberdeen council to expand its hydrogen bus fleet.
Ms Morrison added: “When people did realise low carbon heating was important, concerns switched to costs – whether the upfront cost of installation or potentially higher energy bills.
“These concerns are totally understandable, but as we’ve seen in the recent Climate Change Committee reports, the reality is that not acting in time will result in consumers having to pay even more in the future.”
“Policymakers need to understand what these findings mean for our journey to net zero, and have an honest conversation with the public of the role we have to play.
“While governments need to drive this change, it won’t happen without consumers understanding their role, and the impact it will have upon their lives.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel