IT was 'freedom' - but it was short-lived.
On June 26, the Netherlands relaxed nearly all its remaining Covid restrictions. The Dutch government said they were "no longer necessary" due to vaccines, low infection rates and declining hospital admissions.
Covid cases in the Netherlands had fallen steadily to just 35 infections per million people per day by the time it adopted its 'Step Four' measures (for comparison, the UK is currently recording 515 per million per day, but this is already accelerating rapidly).
From the end of June, life in the Netherlands returned to semi-normality.
There were no limits on the number of people who could gather in homes or share a table in pubs and restaurants.
Mandatory face coverings were scrapped, except in situations where people were sharing crowded and potentially poorly-ventilated spaces such as public transport.
A ban on the sale of alcohol after 10pm was lifted and curfews on hospitality and leisure venues' opening hours abandoned.
Cinemas, concerts halls, shops, bars, restaurants, stadiums and nightclubs could open their doors with limited mitigations.
READ MORE: What more can - and should - we do to boost vaccine uptake in young people?
In the case of restaurants, for example, seating had to be spaced 1.5 metres (5ft) apart.
In venues where people moved around - such as shops and museums - capacity was capped at one person per five metres squared, unless the Coronavirus Entry Pass system was adopted, in which case venues could open at full capacity without distancing or masks.
This domestic 'passport' system was mainly adopted by nightclubs and larger events spaces where revellers were permitted entry only if they had proof of vaccination, a pre-admission negative test, or proof of having had Covid.
It didn't take long for the party to sour, however.
In the space of just two weeks, the Netherlands' virus rate surged seven-fold.
Nightclubs and discos were shut down, the entry pass system suspended, music festivals and other large public events banned until August 14, trading curfews reimposed, and the public urged to limit gatherings in their homes to small numbers with physical distancing - even if people are fully vaccinated.
As of July 14 its infection rate had practically caught up with the UK, with 490 cases per million people per day against the UK's 515.
On Monday, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte conceded that the government had eased restrictions too quickly.
"What we thought was possible turned out to be wrong in practice," he said. "We made a miscalculation, we are disappointed about it and we apologise."
READ MORE: Warning as quarter of under-30s hospitalised with Covid develop complications
The Netherlands is a cautionary tale of how rushing back to too much freedom, too soon, can spectacularly backfire.
By the time it opened up on June 26, only a third of its population had been fully vaccinated and the Delta variant was in the ascendency (it had gone from making up around 10% of Dutch cases on June 14 to 38% by June 28).
We know that people previously infected with non-Delta strains are susceptible to reinfection with this new variant, and that people who have had a single vaccine dose are only 33% less likely to contract symptomatic Delta-Covid than those who are unvaccinated.
When the Netherlands threw open the doors of its bars and nightclubs without restrictions, it invited Delta to the party as well - and now its health system will have to cope with the hangover.
So far the number of patients in hospital remains low (around 119 compared to a peak of more than 3,300 in March last year) but those numbers will rise as infections picked up over the last few weeks feed through into hospitals.
As in Britain, overall admissions will probably remain lower than during previous waves due to vaccination, and a larger share of the patients will be unvaccinated young people.
READ MORE: Vaccinating children - is it too risky? Or too dangerous not to?
But that does not mean the impact should be dismissed.
On the basis of Scotland figures, roughly 1.5-2% of people aged 20 to 39 who test positive for Covid after developing symptoms are ending up in hospital (the real translation of infection-to-hospitalisation is likely to be lower once you take into account asymptomatic infections, however).
Between June 9 and July 6, a total of 357 people aged 20 to 39 were admitted to hospitals in Scotland with Covid.
According to a new study, published in the Lancet on Friday with significant input from researchers at Edinburgh University, 27% of 19-29 year olds and 37% of 30-39 year olds hospitalised with Covid - even those with no pre-existing health issues - suffer complications ranging from kidney and liver problems to neurological and cardiovascular damage, in some cases long-term.
That research was based on patients treated between January and August last year, long before the Delta variant emerged and which separate UK studies have shown doubles the probability of being hospitalised with Covid.
Professor Calum Semple, chief investigator on the Lancet study and a Scottish virologist who sits on the UK's SAGE and NERVTAG expert bodies, said the work "contradicts current narratives that Covid-19 is only dangerous in people with existing co-morbidities and the elderly".
Focusing solely on deaths is also "likely to underestimate the true impact" of the disease on health and care services long-term, said co-author Aya Riad, "particularly in younger people who are more likely to survive severe Covid".
For now, cases in Scotland are high but levelling off with nearly 54% of the total population fully vaccinated and a slower, more cautious reopening underway.
There is every chance that England's Dutch-style 'Freedom Day', with its "bonfire of restrictions" from facemasks to social distancing and long-awaited nightclub reopenings, will be getting reined in by the time Scotland reaches 'Beyond Zero' on August 9.
"Living with the virus" should mean accepting basic mitigations to manage it, at least while the vaccine rollout continues.
Embracing "freedom" just because we wish the pandemic were over already is a strategy doomed to fail.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel