A SIX month delay in a response from the Scottish Government on correspondence from Glasgow City Council over funding for the reopening of the city’s culture and leisure facilities was bordering on contemptuous.
This was the claim was made at city council meeting yesterday, with councillors also disappointed that their letter to the finance minister Kate Forbes on December 16, 2020 did not merit a reply at ministerial level.
After a motion was passed last December, the council wrote to Ms Forbes asking what further funding was available.
Read more: Who will step up to help fund Glasgow treasures and services?
Earlier this year the council itself agreed to give a minimum guarantee of £100m over the next four years to the arms length organisation Glasgow Life which runs the city’s culture and leisure, which has allowed 90 venues to reopen.
The local authority’s final full council session before recess was told a response to their letter had been received this month and dated June 8 2021 from Andrew Sinclair, Depute Director of Active Scotland who stated in the letter he had been asked to reply as the division who are responsible for the policy advice for this issue and did apologise for the length of time it had taken to respond.
Green Councillor Jon Molyneux led a motion in regard to responses the council receives and said: “I really think this is about the council taking a stand for what may seem disrespectful even if that wasn’t the intent. I don’t think this council should have to wait six months for a response from any government even in a pandemic nor do I think we should be content with the content of the response which doesn’t engage the specific issues facing Glasgow which were the focus of the motion. I think we all agree as elected members there is a strong case for a new funding model and for greater national funding of Glasgow’s cultural assets. I think we should expect Scottish ministers and not their officials to engage with this issue. My motion asks us to note my dissatisfaction with the handling of the matter and to urge ministers to engage seriously in these issues facing Glasgow.”
Labour Councillor Archie Graham said: “It is deeply disappointing that the finance minister hasn’t had the courtesy or the manners to respond to this council and instead gets Mr Andrew Sinclair to respond to us. That is bordering on contemptuous. It really is shocking and is indicative of the way that this city and this council is treated by the Scottish Government and has been for over a decade now.”
Read more: Glasgow culture chief in call for future funding agreement
SNP Councillor Richard Bell, speaking on behalf of the SNP group, said: “Of course we would want a ministerial response from this but I would remind colleagues that we are in the middle of a national pandemic and that we have also had a Scottish Parliament election where the SNP government have been returned to power with an increased share of the vote. I think we have to be very mindful of the issues that are in front of us and how those can be dealt with. The way to get the Scottish Government to respond is not by hitting it with a big stick, it is through negotiation and discussion.”
An amended motion was agreed that in all correspondence with government bodies, officers and Lord Provost are mandated to pursue response from Ministerial level if such replies are not immediately forthcoming.
In response the funding question, Mr Sinclair highlighted the value of the overall support package for councils from Scottish Government added up to £1.5 billion.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Ministers recognise how difficult it has been throughout the pandemic for local authorities like Glasgow City Council, who are the guardians of the city’s cultural and community assets.
“We take seriously the Council’s concerns; the value of the overall COVID-19 support package for councils now totals more than £1.5 billion.
“The Scottish Government has received an unprecedented amount of correspondence during the pandemic and has apologised for the time it has taken to respond to the motion on the reopening of the Glasgow Life venues.
“We recognise the huge importance of the role Glasgow Life performs and we are doing everything we can to ensure this vital work continues as soon as the pandemic allows.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel