The Scottish Government announced on Monday that it will scrap the SQA following a report by the OECD recommending a shake-up to the current system.
A new organisation will replace the current body, although this may take "some time" according to the Scottish Education Secretary.
The changes will not take place immediately, but what will the scrapping of the SQA mean for young people in Scotland in the long term?
Why is the SQA being scrapped?
The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA), which has been in place since 1997, accredits educational awards in Scotland.
The body came under fire last year for downgrading grades submitted by teachers, and has been heavily criticised for its replacement assessment system introduced this year.
Now a report by the OECD has made 12 recommendations on how to improve the Scottish curriculum, all of which were accepted by the Scottish Government.
What did the OECD report say?
The review found that there was too much focus on exams in later years of schooling in Scotland.
It backed the Curriculum for Excellence as a whole but stated there needed to be more alignment with the principles of the programme in the later years of school.
According to the report, focus on exams took too much importance in the final three years of school and took away from the more flexible approach to learning designed by the Curriculum for Excellence.
What will the new system look like?
The Scottish Government has said it will consult pupils, teachers and parents in forming the new body.
The Curriculum for Excellence intends to offer a more holistic approach to learning, and therefore the new body could see more teacher assessment throughout the year, and move away from heavily weighted exams.
What will it mean for Scottish pupils in the short term?
The report comes as pupils around the country are receiving their provisional grades as submitted by teachers in place of formal examinations.
The system has been criticised by opposition politicians, however Nicola Sturgeon has assured it is a "world away" from last year's exam results scandal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel