A LABOUR councillor and prominent trade unionist has been awarded more than £22,000 after winning his case for unfair dismissal against the Scottish Police Authority.
George McIrvine, a councillor in Dundee, was sacked over claims he attended Labour Party events to “try to further his own political career” while on secondment as the branch secretary for Unison Police Staff Scotland.
He was accused of falsifying time sheets and failing to seek permission for attending certain events, however an employment tribunal found that he “undertook duties, activities and attended events that were agreed to and supported by Unison for whom he was working on secondment”.
Employment judge Alan Strain also found that the SPA did not know what his duties and responsibilities were as branch secretary and the union’s Labour Link Officer, despite him holding the roles for almost a decade.
Judge Strain said: “The tribunal did not accept that the [SPA] had reasonable grounds for believing that the claimant was guilty of misconduct.”
He added that parts of the authority’s investigation into the claims were “deficient”.
Read more: Labour councillor George McIrvine in legal battle with Police Scotland over sacking
Mr McIrvine was awarded a total of £22,071.21. His original payout was almost £30,000 but it was reduced by 25 per cent after he admitted to taking on paid training with a charity while he was on sick leave from the SPA.
The tribunal heard that Mr McIrvine, a criminal intelligence analyst, began working with the SPA’s equivalent at the time in 1986 and took on the role of full-time trade union representative in 2010.
During his time with Unison, he never sought permission to attend any union-related events.
However, in 2017 a change in the law forced the SPA to introduce a new time sheet system for seconded trade union activists to record their activities. This was to be backdated.
In July the following year, concerns were raised about Mr McIrvine’s log and an investigation was carried out.
The tribunal heard from Inspector Steven McKinnon, the officer who investigated the misconduct allegations, who reported that Mr McIrvine was using his position “to further his own political career by attending events and conferences that were not essential to his role or benefitting to his employer”.
Read more: Imam Yahya Barry wins £30,000 payout after whistleblowing on finances at Edinburgh Central Mosque
Some of those events included a May Day rally on April 30, 2017, and a Labour link conference on July 5.
He also attended the election of former Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard the same year.
It was also alleged that he falsified travel times and other information on another occasion.
Detective Chief Superintendent Sean Scott was appointed as disciplinary officer, however the tribunal noted that he “did not know what the duties and responsibilities of the claimant as Branch Secretary and Labour Link Officer were”.
Mr Scott went on to find that the issue around the attendance at events, the allegations of falsifying information, and the secondary employment demonstrated a “lack of integrity and honesty” on Mr McIrvine’s part.
He dismissed him on June 3, 2019.
Read more: Landmark legal bid aims to get unpaid tribunal pay-outs honoured
The trade unionist tried to appeal the decision but this was also rejected by the police watchdog.
However, the tribunal found that the SPA’s decision had no reasonable basis.
The judge said the authority failed to take account of the fact that no training or direction had been given on completing the new time sheets or that they were simply a record-keeping exercise, not a claim for paid time.
He also criticised the watchdog for failing to fully consider Mr McIrvine’s claims that the entries in the log had been made by way of a “calender dump” rather than input individually, and that his attendance at the Labour leader election was done in his own time.
A spokesperson for the Scottish Police Authority said: “The authority notes the judgment, and does not comment on individual cases.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel