The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have clashed with the BBC over the version of events that led to the naming of their daughter.
Harry and Meghan’s lawyers have written to the corporation after a BBC story claimed the Queen had not been asked about naming their baby Lilibet, which was the monarch’s childhood family nickname.
It has been widely reported that Harry and Meghan did consult with the Queen before the name of their baby, who was born in California on Friday, was announced.
Harry and Meghan have named their daughter Lilibet (Victoria Jones/PA)
But an article on the BBC’s website claimed palace sources had said the Queen was not asked by the duke and duchess about naming their daughter Lilibet.
A spokeswoman for the couple said their daughter’s name was mentioned in a conversation with the Queen.
READ MORE: Where does Harry and Meghan’s daughter fall in the line of succession?
She said: “The duke spoke with his family in advance of the announcement, in fact his grandmother was the first family member he called.
“During that conversation, he shared their hope of naming their daughter Lilibet in her honour. Had she not been supportive, they would not have used the name.”
Lilibet has arrived! Congratulations to my brave friend and her lovely family! ❤️ #allthatmatters #babyjoy pic.twitter.com/kusAJBdZBx
— Misan Harriman (@misanharriman) June 6, 2021
The Times newspaper reported the couple’s lawyers Schillings have sent a letter to the BBC warning the story is “false and defamatory”.
The story by one of the BBC’s royal correspondents remains on the corporation’s website.
Buckingham Palace has declined to comment.
The row comes just a few weeks after Lord Dyson’s report into the 1995 Panorama interview with Harry’s mother Diana, Princess of Wales.
It concluded that journalist Martin Bashir used “deceitful behaviour” to land the world exclusive and an internal BBC investigation a year later had covered it up.
Harry and Meghan with their son Archie in South Africa (Toby Melville/PA)
Lilibet “Lili” Diana Mountbatten-Windsor, a younger sister for the Sussexes’ two-year-old son Archie, was born at 11.40am on Friday June 4 at Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital in California weighing 7lb 11oz.
The Sussexes have faced heartbreak and division after they quit as senior working royals last year and plunged the monarchy into crisis with their bombshell Oprah Winfrey interview in March.
Harry made further controversial comments about his family in the following weeks, and has also experienced a long-running rift with his brother William.
But he has always spoken warmly about his grandmother and late grandfather, and the Queen has referred to her grandson and his family in sympathetic terms.
🇬🇧 | The Invictus Games are coming to Germany. And today, Harry, Duke of Sussex and German Minister of Defence @akk reveal when the international sport event for wounded, injured and sick servicemen and women will take place:
The Invictus Games Düsseldorf: 9-16 September 2023 pic.twitter.com/b0SSnSr1MA
— Invictus Games Düsseldorf 2023 (@InvictusGamesDE) June 9, 2021
Lilibet is the Queen’s family nickname and the choice pays tribute to the monarch at a challenging time for the Windsors, who are mourning the loss of the Duke of Edinburgh.
READ MORE: The Duke and Duchess of Sussex announce the birth of baby 'Lilibet' named after the Queen and Diana
The new baby is the Queen’s 11th great-grandchild, and the first to be born since Philip’s death.
But with the Sussexes living in California and amid troubled relationships with Harry’s family, it is not known when or if the new addition will meet the Queen and the rest of the royals.
The row with the BBC did not stop Harry announcing the latest host country for his Invictus Games, revealing in a social media video that Germany will stage the event for 2023.
“It’s time to spread the news something big is coming to Germany,” the duke said in the clip that featured Germany’s defence minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel