THE SNP'S Social Justice Secretary has claimed the UK Government ending the £20 Universal Credit uplift would be a “callous act” which will push thousands of children into poverty.
Shona Robison spoke as MSPs debated how to tackle poverty on Tuesday.
A report by Loughborough University on behalf of the End Child Poverty coalition last month found that levels of child poverty have risen in every Scottish local authority over the past six years.
The Scottish Government is calling for all powers relating to employment and social security to be devolved from the UK Government.
But, opposition parties said the Scottish Government must do more with its existing powers before demanding more responsibility from Westminster.
Ms Robison said: “If we didn’t already need it, the pandemic further evidenced that the UK welfare system is not fit for purpose and risks undermining our hard won progress.
“This is the system people in Scotland must rely on and we shouldn’t have to mitigate against polices we disagree with like the £80 million we spent last year in Discretionary Housing Payments to mitigate the bedroom tax in full and support people with housing – money we could be investing in other anti-poverty measures.
READ MORE: SNP to pledge to 'eradicate poverty' despite child poverty struggles
“We should have those powers in our hands within this Parliament.
“The removal of the £20 uplift to Universal Credit will be a callous act which will push 60,000 families across Scotland, including 20,000 children, into poverty and will result in families unable to work receiving, on average, £1,600 less per year than they would have done a decade ago in 2011.
“That is massive, it’s a massive threat to the progress we could make here.”
The Social Justice Secretary also announced an extra £250,000 for the British Red Cross’s crisis support payments to help those most at risk of destitution.
The Government will also trial “family wellbeing budgets” in partnership with the Hunter Foundation, she said.
The Scottish Conservatives accused the Government of failing to implement all of the benefit powers it received in the 2016 Scotland Act.
The party’s social justice spokesman, Miles Briggs, said there was concern the pandemic would push more people into homelessness, saying there should be a national “housing first” programme.
He also called for more to be done on providing healthcare services to people facing homelessness, saying: “I’m disappointed that we’re seeing very little progress in provision and access of healthcare services for people who face these issues.
“All these powers lie with us in this parliament.”
Quoting a constituent, he said homeless people felt they were being treated as “second-class citizens” as they were not allowed to register at normal GP surgeries.
Mr Briggs said his party also supported doubling the devolved Scottish Child Payment benefit as soon as possible.
Scottish Labour’s social justice spokeswoman, Pam Duncan-Glancy, said: “Right now, all we’re doing with the powers we have on disability benefits is improving the administration of them, which does – I will concede – need to be improved.
“But ultimately, our ambitions must be bigger than administering it a little bit better than the Tories.
“Several years after getting the powers in this area, we are still using the rotten old DWP (Department of Work and Pensions) rulebook – it is still the people [that] the DWP say deserve the support that get it.”
Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman spoke to her amendment, which called on the Scottish Government to work with Westminster and bring forward pilots for a universal basic income.
“We are here to fix the system, not patch its flaws,” Ms Chapman said.
“We are here to make hope possible and that requires us to be radical.”
Scottish Lib Dem MSP Alex Cole-Hamilton said: “This Government cannot blame the full extent of the poverty that exists in this country on a government operating from another city – not when it has been empowered for years to address that poverty but still elects not to.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel