A motion calling for a review of the in-house legal and secretarial function of the governing body will be voted on at August’s Annual General Meeting of the Scottish Rugby Union.
The backdrop to this is the tension between the Union (consisting of member clubs which is the governing body of the game of rugby in this country) and Scottish Rugby Limited (the wholly owned subsidiary which is responsible for running the business). In an ideal world, these two organisations would work together for the benefit of the game at all levels in Scotland, but in recent years there has been a growing disconnect between the Union’s member clubs and the paid executives of the limited company.
If the motion is voted through, the SRU Council – elected by the clubs to oversee the whole organisation – will be charged with looking into “the efficacy, efficiency and propriety of the in-house legal and Secretarial function of the Scottish Rugby Union” and be asked to consider “the relative advantages and disadvantages of continuing such functions in-house when compared with outsourcing to a third party or third parties, in part or in whole”.
The motion has been proposed by Haddington RFC and seconded by Currie amid concerns that there are conflicts of interest within the current set-up which has led to instances where the needs and wishes of member clubs have not been served and/or the reputation of the Scottish Rugby Union has been negatively impacted. A number of examples of this are cited in the motion, including a lack of oversight of executive pay details at Board level which led to uproar when it emerged that Chief Executive Mark Dodson had pocketed £933,000 in salary and bonuses for the financial year up to 31st May 2019.
As previously reported, two other motions will also be voted on at the AGM. The first is to replace Super6 with an inter-district championship. The second calls for full transparency with regard to how the Scottish Government’s recent £20m Covid bail-out for rugby is spent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here