FOURTEEN Scottish care homes required five inspection visits during the pandemic before they were deemed ‘adequately’ safe for residents, a damning report found.
The extent to which some homes failed to improve infection control or it actually worsened as knowledge about thhe virus increased has been described as ‘concerning’.
Campaign group Care Home Relatives Scotland (CHRS) which compiled the report, said it was understandable that homes might have struggled with new protocols during the early stages of the pandemic but said it was ‘unacceptable’ that this was continuing more than a year later.
READ MORE: New data reveals care homes which recorded the highest and lowest number of Covid cases
Inspections did not resume until May 4 2020 and were changed to focus on infection control with the wellbeing of residents also taken into consideration.
A total of 18 homes with 921 residents required three visits from inspectors before they were categorised as ‘adequate’ and further safety checks were not required.
Four homes with 132 residents were either de-registered after the first follow-up visit or or an application was taken forward.
“While proportionally, the numbers are small, it is unacceptable that up to 132 residents were living in care homes where conditions were such that an application for de-registration was considered at the first follow up visit.”
While 137 care homes did reach a good enough level of performance in the first inspection visit, the report found that very few of the remaining care homes improved beyond an ‘Adequate’ grade, even after numerous inspection visits and there appeared to be little incentive for them to do so.
READ MORE: Covid death rates were six times higher in larger care homes
CHRS said adequate was “not good enough” for the most vulnerable members of society.
In the latest round of inspections, laid before parliament last week, a number of homes were rated weak in all categories including Cowdray Club in Aberdeen, which is run by Renaissance Care and The Alford Service.
The report described the use of previous grades and intelligence to identify high risk care homes as “flawed”, particularly at a time when there was a ban on family ‘advocates’.
“Our research has shown that even those previously graded as Good or Better than ‘Good’ can fall into lower grades within as little as six months.”
A total of 172 (53.3%) of care homes were evaluated as Grade 3 (Adequate) in their latest visit, with 68% rated less than ‘good’.
The report said the “pain and suffering” of residents could have been reduced if family members had they been permitted to have regular access to their relatives in their own rooms, throughout the pandemic.
READ MORE: Hancock: Scottish care homes had 'same issues' to deal with
Few relatives were aware of their right to essential visits due to “a lack of communication from the Scottish Government or the Care Inspectorate”.
Many relatives simply accepted “poor practice” including being limited to 30-minute distanced visits.
The information issued by care homes was often "their own version of the guidance and many relatives did not know where to go for help”.
CHRS said that at the very least every care home resident should be entitled to have meaningful contact with one nominated person, despite any type of lockdown the care home experiences.
A spokesman for the Care Inspectorate said: “”Care providers should support meaningful contact through visiting which includes enabling privacy for in-person visits.
“Meaningful contact should also be included in individual care plans, with clear strategies in place to enable staff to provide the right support to people as required.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel