John Swinney has said Police Scotland is not investigating the SNP’s finances following an MP in charge of the party’s accounts quitting.
It comes following reports that police were investigating £600,000 of party funds.
Asked if the police were looking into missing party funds, Mr Swinney said: “Not to my knowledge.”
Yesterday, Douglas Chapman, the MP for Dunfermline and West Fife, announced he had resigned as national treasurer of the party.
He claimed he was not given enough information to do the job.
Questioned on BBC Scotland’s The Sunday Show about whether Police Scotland was investigating “£600,000 of SNP funds that was raised by activists and campaigners and perhaps diverted elsewhere?”, Scotland’s Deputy First Minister John Swinney replied: “Not to my knowledge, no.”
'I don't understand' why the SNP national treasurer quit
— BBC Scotland News (@BBCScotlandNews) May 30, 2021
Deputy First Minister @JohnSwinney also denied claims that police were investigating the whereabouts of £600,000 of party funds#BBCSundayShow
Read more ➡️ https://t.co/Edh5WaDrV7 pic.twitter.com/IgxFpgLI27
READ MORE: Douglas Chapman: SNP national treasurer resigns
On the resignation of Mr Chapman he added: “I don’t understand quite what’s prompted this. The National Executive Committee has responsibility for scrutinising the party’s finances and I saw that point was confirmed on social media last night.
"In addition to that, the accounts are independently audited by external auditors and submitted to the Electoral Commission for scrutiny. There’s a huge amount of scrutiny of party finances that go on. That happens daily within the SNP and so it should.”
Last month, Police Scotland sources told the Scottish Mail on Sunday the force had investigated complaints into the SNP, but found “no immediate evidence of fraud”.
The party said at the time the allegations were part of a “dirty tricks campaign” and “utterly baseless”.
Mr Chapman took over in the role last year.
On Twitter, he said: “Despite having a resounding mandate from members to introduce more transparency into the party’s finances, I have not received the support or financial information to carry out the fiduciary duties of National Treasurer.
“Regretfully I have resigned with immediate effect.”
SNP business convener and fellow MP Kirsten Oswald said she “fundamentally disagrees” with Mr Chapman’s assessment, although the reasons for him standing down from the role are not entirely clear.
She tweeted: “I am disappointed by Douglas’ decision and, as business convener, fundamentally disagree with his assessment of the support and financial information available to him.
“However, I respect his decision, thank him for his contribution to the NEC (National Executive Committee) and wish him well.
“SNP national treasurers have access to detailed financial information and report to the NEC on a monthly basis.
“The NEC can request any additional information it requires.
“The SNP’s accounts are also independently audited, submitted to the Electoral Commission and published.”
READ MORE: UK Supreme Court sets date for hearing on Holyrood's powers
A Police Scotland spokesperson said: “The complaint is still being assessed to determine if an investigation is required.”
The row prompted criticism from opposition parties.
Scottish Conservative chief whip Stephen Kerr said: “It speaks volumes that even the SNP’s national treasurer can’t get the party to open the books.
“There are obvious questions the leadership have yet to answer for members and even their own politicians.
“But even simple pleas for transparency have further opened up the rift between the nationalists.”
Scottish Labour’s deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: “Douglas Chapman’s extraordinary resignation makes it essential that the SNP are open about the growing number of questions about their finances.
“Earlier this year the party was placed under police investigation for a £600,000 black hole in their finances, launched after three members of their finance and audit committee resigned.
“There are clearly issues that need to be looked at within the secretive inner workings and inner circle that runs the SNP.
“Nicola Sturgeon must agree to open the party’s books to public scrutiny so investigators can get to the bottom of this mess.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel