WHAT do you do if you’ve left your country’s borders open to variants, squandered £37 billion on a test and trace system with “no clear evidence” that it has cut infections, and consistently failed to ensure that vulnerable people have the financial support to self-isolate?
You could hold your hands up, accept the criticism, and rectify the situation.
Or you could tell the public it is up to them to exert “common sense” judgements, urge them against (but not ban) holidays in amber list countries, and pass the buck for outbreaks of 'Indian' and other variants to “vaccine hesitancy” among deprived neighbourhoods and ethnic minorities.
Unsurprisingly, the UK Government opted for the latter this week, and has faced something of a backlash.
In Scotland too, some politicians and public health leaders have been drawing attention to lower vaccine uptakes in some groups to explain why Covid case rates have soared in parts of Glasgow and left the city in level three limbo.
Scotland’s national clinical director Jason Leitch said that up to 15 per cent of Glasgow’s vulnerable population might have missed their first appointment.
READ MORE: Watchdog orders release of Covid care home deaths figures withheld for months
The situation is not entirely clear cut, however.
Firstly – yes – there is objective evidence that people from poorer areas or ethnic minorities are less likely to be vaccinated.
The most recent data from Public Health Scotland shows that in all the age groups from 50 up, white people were consistently the most likely to have been inoculated.
In the 60-64 age group, as of April 21, white people were 26% more likely to have been vaccinated than African people living in Scotland, while 50-54-year-old whites were 21% more likely to have been vaccinated than people of Black/Caribbean ethnicity.
Similar patterns are to be found for deprivation with the very highest uptakes among “decile nine” groups living in the second most affluent tenth of postcodes (curiously, those in the most affluent areas of all tend to be slightly more anti-vax, as seen with the MMR jag).
The very lowest uptakes are consistently found in decile one communities, however, where around 10% fewer people aged 50-54 have had a first dose compared to their decile nine counterparts (80% versus 89.7%).
Surely this smacks of “hesitancy” then?
Well, maybe in some cases – but the reality is more complex.
A report in April by the Deep End group of GPs who work in Scotland’s most deprived communities highlighted their concerns about the risk of “marginalised groups” being missed.
They warned that a failure to be more proactive in vaccinating these individuals “risks a resurgence in Covid cases in our most deprived areas as lockdown eases”.
The fact that “mass vaccination centres are not always well matched to postcode” can throw up obstacles for those with mobility problems who are faced with getting there and back on public transport.
READ MORE: Fewer than one in five applications for self-isolation support payments granted in Scotland
People with “severe and enduring” mental health difficulties were also at risk of low vaccine uptake, and the report cautioned that some shielders with long-term conditions “are now very fearful of leaving home, never mind getting public transport and attending mass vaccination centres”.
Such chronic physical and mental health conditions are, notably, more common in deprived areas, and deprived areas are also disproportionately non-white.
The report called on health boards to accommodate a bigger role for GPs, for example allowing them to “mop up those missed in the initial rollout”.
A second issue is to what extent lower vaccination uptake can actually be said to be causing a surge in cases.
Both Bolton and Bedford, the hot spots for the so-called Indian variant in England, have vaccination coverage in line with the average across England, although UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock said that in Bolton “the majority of people in hospital with coronavirus were eligible for the jab but have chosen not yet to have the jab”.
In Blackburn and Darwen, though, six of the nine patients in hospital had been vaccinated (most probably becoming infected before or shortly after their first dose).
Labour MP for Bolton South East, Yasmin Qureshi, noted that her constituency also had “a significant number of intergenerational households as well as high levels of deprivation and unemployment”.
In such communities people are more likely to live in accommodation without space to isolate from other family members, or to work in occupations that cannot be done from home or where self-isolating due to virus symptoms or potential exposure is unaffordable, increasing the risk that infections spread.
“Factor into this that 30% of households do not have access to a car, it all creates a perfect storm for additional barriers to the vaccine,” added Ms Qureshi, echoing the warnings of the Deep End GPs.
In Scotland, however, more than 81% of the 2,134 cases in the past seven days have been in people aged 44 or younger who are unlikely to have been offered a first vaccine yet or who will have had their first dose too recently to have developed immunity.
There were also 515 infections in children under 15 who are not even eligible for vaccination.
Similarly in the week to May 12, half of those admitted to hospital with Covid in Scotland – 34 from a total of 67 – were patients under 45.
READ MORE: Glasgow's Indian variant outbreak is the price we pay for UK's 'leaky' border controls
Failures of England’s Test and Trace system have also been implicated in the spread of the B1.617.2 variant, however.
A leaked report this week revealed that eight local authorities in England did not have access to full data on positive cases in their area over a period of three weeks in April and May, when infections were on the rise. The number of missing cases was highest in the Blackburn area.
“This is not a vaccine hesitancy issue,” said Dr Zubaida Haque, a member of the independent SAGE expert group.
“This is about the fact that the government have left open the border... with no virus suppression strategy to stop the Indian variant spreading across the country.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel