MANY of Scotland’s most popular tourist attractions are unable to fully re-open due to continuing restrictions and the need to make cost savings.
A survey has laid bare the devastating impact of the pandemic on the country’s historic venues, art galleries and heritage sites, which contribute £11 billion to the Scottish economy.
One in eight sites said they will be forced to remain closed for all of 2021 without further easing of coronavirus restrictions, such as social distancing, while smaller attractions, many of which are staffed by older volunteers, are at risk of shutting for good.
READ MORE: Scots spending trebles in opening hours of lockdown restrictions easing
Tourism experts said with the risk of a possible third wave of Covid and further lockdowns, many operators will be facing “real problems”.
Attractions are at the heart of tourism
Two-thirds of Scottish attractions due to open this week expect to operate with either reduced hours, some facilities closed, or at weekends only to keep costs down.
They include ticketed landmarks such as Edinburgh Castle – which saw visitor numbers plummet by 87.2 per cent last year – Linlithgow Palace, and free attractions such as the V&A Dundee and House for an Art Lover in Glasgow.
Other smaller venues said they were not expecting to reopen until late summer, including the Skara Brae site in Orkney.
(Table shows re-opening capacity and dates)
Overall visitor numbers slumped by almost 34 million in 2020, a fall of 63.2%, with 153 sites closed for the full 12 months, according to data from the Moffat Centre for Travel and Tourism at Glasgow Caledonian University.
READ MORE: 'Relief' as Nicola Sturgeon re-opens islands to tourism
Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum in Glasgow and the National Museum of Scotland saw visitor numbers drop by 85.8% and 79.9% respectively.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, attractions with large outdoor areas such as country parks outperformed museums, art galleries and castles.
Edinburgh Zoo was Scotland’s busiest paid-for site last year, attracting 292,631 visitors, a drop of 46.4% on the previous 12 months.
Culloden Visitor Centre attracted 182,496 visitors as it recorded battlefield-only visits for the first time while the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh was the most popular free site with 452,479 visits.
The stark figures prompted a call from tourism leaders for 'staycationers' to support Scotland’s attractions, which have been held up by the Government for excellence in Covid safety.
Professor John Lennon, director of the Moffat Centre at GCU, said: “Normally at this time of year I’d be reporting continued growth.
'“Now what you are looking at is an overwhelming drop of 63% – literally millions of people not attending.
“Attractions are at the heart of tourism, they are the iconic representation of the country.
“The pandemic has created problems for many attractions with social distancing – often heritage buildings don’t adapt well to two-metre social distancing.
READ MORE: Wedding caterers slam 'insulting' marquee ban that doesn't apply to pubs and restaurants
“A lot of the smaller attractions are really struggling to work out the economics of operation and really considering whether to reopen – and remember a lot of them are staffed by volunteers, who are perhaps over 50 or 60 so there are risks for them.
“Even with vaccinations people are anxious. And with the possibility of a third wave and further lockdowns, many are facing real problems.
“Realistically these indoor attractions are doing their best to comply with Government regulations. They have been branded exemplary in terms of their practices.”
Prof Lennon added: “Visitors should be comfortable and I would hope that domestic tourists will make the best of the time to visit the range and variety of attractions that Scotland has to offer at a time when they won’t be overcrowded and over-busy. It will be a good experience.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel