AS IF the wine world wasn't complicated enough, we still have the annoyance of multi-name grapes to put up with. Shiraz v Syrah is the obvious example but another regular bugbear of mine is the confusion that arises between Pinot Grigio and Pinot Gris. I mean, seriously, can the winemakers of the world not unite around a glass and choose a name?
The white name conundrum is particularly annoying, especially with the lovers of Pinot Gris who will often argue to the bitter end that there's more than a name difference: 'My Gris tastes totally different from that Italian Pinot you opened last week.'
Well, of course it does you plonker, it's from New Zealand.
While that may sound petulant, it isn't. Italian Pinot Grigio is usually harvested early which retains more of the acidity and the lively fruit, both of which are common wine traits whether red or white in the land of pasta.
The New World producers on the other hand have tended to mimic the pinots of Alsace with a more aromatic, drier and full on style which can often come across as spicy to many palates.
There's another interesting aspect to the grape, however, and one that will appeal to many. Even for a wine snob like myself, it performs reasonably well at the bargain basement and is rather spectacular around the £15 to £25 mark. So you really don't have to break the bank to feel like you're in Downton with this one.
You can follow me on Twitter @gerardfinewine
M&S Classics Pinot Grigio
Served lightly chilled, it's perfect for a lazy weekend afternoon with friends. Soft flowery aromas with hints of peach and lemon on the palate. Cracking value.
Marks&Spencer £7
Domaine de Coudoulet Pinot Gris
This is gorgeous. Fresh slightly racy flowery aroma with peaches and apricot fruits evident on a crisp refreshing palate. Enjoy with fish.
Oddbins £11.50
Gerard Richardson
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here