Former attorney general Dominic Grieve has launched a blistering attack on Boris Johnson, saying he must explain how the refurbishment of his Downing Street flat was paid for.
It comes after the Prime Minister’s former top adviser, Dominic Cummings, accused Mr Johnson of plotting to get Tory donors to pay for the work amid reports he was given a donation of £58,000.
Mr Grieve – a long-standing critic of Mr Johnson – described the Prime Minister as a “vacuum of integrity” who must come now clean.
“It is all smoke and mirrors. He hasn’t said when he decided to repay it or whether he has now repaid it,” he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.
READ MORE: Downing Street sources point finger at Dominic Cummings over Dyson text leaks
“The fact is that he did get, I think it has become quite clear, a significant gift towards the refurbishment of the flat.
“If a minister goes abroad and gets given a gold watch by a foreign he has to hand it back to the Government or he has to buy it back. He doesn’t end up with £58,000 – if that’s figure – for refurbishing your private flat in Downing Street.
“My impression is there has been constant wriggling about the source of the money for this refurbishment.”
Meanwhile, Labour has called on the Government to release full details of how the refurbishment of Boris Johnson’s Downing Street flat was paid for.
The Government has said the Prime Minister paid for the work out of his own pocket, however his former top adviser Dominic Cummings accused Mr Johnson of wanting Tory donors to secretly fund the work.
Shadow communities secretary Steve Reed told the BBC Radio 4 programme: “We are calling for the Government to publish any correspondence relating to payments or donations around the refurbishment.
“We need to know the full amount that was spent and we need to know who paid for the work in the first place who the Prime Minister now proposes to reimburse.”
He added: “If people are making significant donations to the Conservative Party, to the Government, we need to know who they are so that we can make sure the Government isn’t doing favours for them in return.
READ MORE: Dyson and Greensill: Is this sleaze? Or is it just the Tories being themselves?
“That is what sleaze is all about. That is the behaviour of a tin pot dictatorship. Britain, frankly, deserves a lot better than that.”
In response to Mr Cummings’ claims about the funding of the flat refurbishment, the statement said: “At all times, the Government and ministers have acted in accordance with the appropriate codes of conduct and electoral law.
“Cabinet Office officials have been engaged and informed throughout and official advice has been followed.”
Earlier a Government statement said that Mr Johnson had met the cost of the flat refurbishment – which reportedly ran to £200,000 – out of his own pocket.
Former foreign secretary Lord Hague said he did not know if there was any truth in the claims but said that Downing Street would need to come up with some “good answers”.
“If all of these things were true, they would be damaging to anybody, including a prime minister,” he told Times Radio.
Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner said the Government was “lurching between cover-ups and cock-ups”.
“Labour is focusing on jobs, crime and the NHS, while the Conservatives are fighting each other like rats in a sack and slipping deeper and deeper into the mire of sleaze,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel