BORIS Johnson's Government has been accused of " lurching between cover-ups and cock-ups" amid further calls for an inquiry after bombshell claims by Dominic Cummings.
The former top advisor to the Prime Minister made a series of allegations this evening after Downing Street sources blamed him for high-profile leaks of sensitive information.
He claims Mr Johnson knew he had not leaked information, and previously described rumours suggesting as much as "total b******t"
Scottish Conservatives leader Douglas Ross said the "serious concerns...cannot be allowed to continue" when asked about lobbying concerns on the campaign trail today.
He was asked about the growing concerns about personal lobbying of Government ministers by private firms, prior to the Cummings claims being released.
Mr Ross said: "I would say that every government should seek to act in the most transparent and open way possible, and the serious concerns that have been raised just in the last few weeks cannot be allowed to continue.
“That’s both at UK level or for any devolved administration in the United Kingdom as well.”
Labour's Angela Rayner said the Government had been "lurching between cover-ups and cock-ups." following the publication of Mr Cummings' claims.
She said: "It shows breath-taking contempt for the country. The choice couldn’t be clearer: a Labour Party focused on the country or a Conservative one focused on themselves and their chums.”
Her colleague Rachel Reeves, the party's shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, said there had to be an investigation into the refurbishment of the Prime Minister's flat, after Mr Cummings said it was "unethical, foolish and possible illegal".
She said: "There is something deeply suspect about how Boris Johnson and the Government have been trying to cover up the luxury refurbishment of No.10.
“Throughout the course of the last year the government has been repeatedly evasive about who has been paying for the refurbishment. That leaves far too many questions marks over potential special favours that could have been cashed in on the back of that donation.
“Given we know it only takes a text from one of the Prime Minister’s chums to get a tax break, what might a discreet donation for a luxury refurbishment might get you?
“The cover-up around the Number 10 refurb is the tip of the iceberg of Tory sleaze.
“It has been claimed by the Prime Minister's former Chief Advisor that what was intended was unethical, foolish, possibly illegal and would break the rules on disclosing donations. These are serious accusations which need investigating in full.
Former Conservative Party leader Lord William Hague said that Mr Cummings was trying to do "as much damage as possible" to Mr Johnson.
Speaking on Times Radio, he said: "Whenever anybody reads something like this, you do have to bear in mind this is somebody evidently very angry about being accused, in this morning's newspapers of being the source of leaks, so he's replying to that there's the retaliation against that so it seems, and clearly trying to do as much damage to the Prime Minister as possible, really, reading and listening to what's in this statement."
However Ian Blackford, the SNP's Westminster leader, said there now must be an inquiry.
He said: "Boris Johnson’s attempt to use Dominic Cummings as a dead cat distraction from the Tory sleaze scandal has spectacularly backfired. Mr Cummings has now raised further serious questions over the PM’s conduct, including his “unethical, foolish, possibly illegal” dodgy donor plans.
"There must be a full independent public inquiry into the Tory sleaze scandal and the accusations of privileged access, impropriety and possible illegality. That is the only way to ensure full transparency, root out Tory cronyism, and ensure those responsible are held to account."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel