THE UK Government has apologised for failing to properly commemorate Commonwealth soldiers who died fighting for the British Empire during World War One.
A report by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission found "pervasive racism" had led to at least 116,000 casualties, mainly of African, Indian and Egyptian origin, not being "commemorated by name or possibly not commemorated at all".
In the Commons today UK Defence Secretary Ben Wallace expressed "deep regret" about what had happened, and said there was "no doubt" prejudice had played a part in the failure to recognise all those who died.
The Commonwealth War Graves Commission, (CWGS) which is tasked with commemorating those who died in the two world wars, has also apologised over its findings.
Labour MP David Lammy called it a "watershed moment" and said the fallen soldiers must no longer be "whitewashed" out of the history books.
The CWGS published a report on the issue following a documentary, presented by Mr Lammy, in 2019 highlighting the missing and disproportionate memorials for Commonwealth veterans, compared to their white counterparts.
Mr Wallace told MPs he has “regret” about what he learned of the First World War in his education and promised to “rectify” the matter for future students.
Mr Wallace said: "On behalf of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission and the government both of the time and today, I want to apologise for the failures to live up to their founding principles all those years ago and express deep regret that it has taken so long to rectify the situation.
"Whilst we can't change the past, we can make amends and take action," he said.
He said there were cases where the commission "deliberately overlooked evidence" that would have allowed it to find the names of the dead.
He explained that there were examples of officials employing an "overarching imperial ideology connected to racial and religious differences" in order to "divide the dead and treat them unequally in ways that were impossible in Europe".
Mr Lammy said the findings constituted “most definitely a watershed moment in the life of this country” and called on the Government to provide resources to help young people across the globe know more about the efforts of those from the Commonwealth.
He told MPs: “All of us in the chamber, and it is still the case in this country, when we think of the First World War we think of the Western Front and we think of the poems of Wilfred Owen and The Battle of the Somme.
“We do not think of where the first bullets were fired in the First World War, which were in fact in the East African Campaign in Africa.”
He continued: “There is no higher service than to die for your country in war and it is the case that every single culture on the planet honours those who die in those circumstances.
“It is a great travesty and a stain and a shame that this country failed to do that for black and brown people across Africa, India and the Middle East.”
Mr Lammy added: “Can I just ask the Secretary of State … because I do think further resources will be necessary, particularly in those countries to commemorate in the appropriate way, and the necessary resources to revisit the archives in those countries to find names where there are names but to appropriately commemorate where those names do not exist.
“We use the word whitewash for a reason. Let there be no more whitewashing. The unremembered will be remembered and future generations of young people in their own country and the Commonwealth will understand their sacrifice.”
Responding, Mr Wallace pledged funding and “the full weight of our defence diplomatic network” to ensure the efforts of Commonwealth soldiers can be better remembered.
The Defence Secretary told MPs: “Exactly as (Mr Lammy) said, the East African Campaign, the early salvos of the First World War. And was I taught that at school? No.
“How many in this House probably were? Almost none at all.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel