A POLICY of deporting rough sleepers who are not UK nationals has been branded 'inhumane' by a charity.
The Home Office strategy was brought in last year as part of changes to the immigration system amid the Government’s bid for tougher border restrictions and a “firmer and fairer” immigration system after Brexit.
The plan means EU citizens found rough sleeping could be removed from the country if they refuse offers of support or if they 'disengage' with services.
This is already the case for non-EU citizens found on the streets, and was widely condemned previously.
Guidance published this week as the policy was put into practice said the rules applied to applications made "on or after December 1 2020 and decisions to cancel taken on or after December 1 2020”.
READ MORE: Johnson offers "no apology"over Dyson texts as officials insist he followed rules
But the document added that the rules were changed on April 6 to “clarify that permission may only be refused or cancelled where a person has repeatedly refused suitable offers of support and engaged in persistent anti-social behaviour”.
Campaigners have condemned the plan, with homeless charity Crisis saying it could leave people with no legal status facing “destitution”.
Chief executive Jon Sparkes said the charity does not accept the policy and has urged authorities not to use the powers “in any circumstances”.
He added: “Everyone in our society should have a safe place to live and shouldn’t face punishment for experiencing homelessness.
"This policy completely goes against this – it is inhumane and its mere existence will make non-UK nationals in vulnerable circumstances fearful of asking for the support they need to help them off the streets."
He called for the Government to instead look at providing the “right support” for people living on the streets such as accommodation, as well as jobs and immigration advice.
Domestic Abuse Commissioner Nicole Jacobs raised concerns over how the rules could affect migrant victims facing homelessness by “forcing them to stay with an abuser rather than risk being thrown out of the country” if they are unable to access benefits or find a place in a refuge.
She added: “All victims of domestic abuse need and deserve protection – not to be pushed further from support.
READ MORE: Crony row: Ian Blackford tells PM to publish all personal Covid contract messages today
“I am calling on the Government to change these guidelines to ensure that migrant domestic abuse victims who are sleeping rough are not impacted by these new rules.”
Last year Labour-run Haringey Council said it opposed the plan and refused to support it.
While acknowledging that rough sleepers are among some of the most vulnerable people in society, the Home Office guidance paper added: “The introduction of rough sleeping as a ground for the refusal or cancellation of permission is not intended to criminalise rough sleeping or to penalise those who inadvertently find themselves temporarily without a roof over their head.
“Instead, the rule will be applied to those who refuse to engage with the range of available support mechanisms and who engage in persistent anti-social behaviour.
“Where a person is engaged in persistent on-street anti-social behaviour but there is no evidence they are sleeping rough, the rough sleeping rule cannot be used to refuse or cancel permission to stay in the UK.
“Instead, you must consider if permission can be refused or cancelled on the grounds of criminality or persistent offending.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel