The Absolute Book
Elizabeth Knox
Michael Joseph, £14.99
Review by Fiona Rintoul
Books are so oversold these days that it is difficult not to see “mesmerising” on a cover and think, “mediocre”, not to learn that this is the one book you should read this year and resolve to pass. A blizzard of hard-to-live-up-to superlatives along the “luminous” and “tour de force” lines heralded the publication of The Absolute Book by New Zealand author Elizabeth Knox, and so it was with trepidation that I opened its pages.
Therein lies a complex tale that veers between real-life concerns and the world of the Sidhe, Celtic fairy people re-envisioned by Knox. Replete with gods both Christian and pagan, “Taken” people, visits to Hell’s Gate, talking ravens and plenty more besides, The Absolute Book certainly has its moments – the Sidhe and their world are richly imagined.
This is, in many ways, a book about books themselves and their power. Each section begins with a literary quotation, and the text is sprinkled with references to works as various as The Da Vinci Code and The Mabinogion. The protagonist, Taryn Cornick, is a writer whose book about threats to libraries from infernos and economic austerity becomes an unexpected bestseller. Taryn tumbles into the world of the Sidhe through a library door, and their world is linked to this one by the mystery that surrounds a scroll box named the Firestarter.
This bookish focus allows Knox to make a lot of doubtless valid points about the destruction and preservation of books and the ideas they contain. “It’s always better to keep books,” Taryn tells the audience at a literary event in Auckland. “In the same way that it’s better not to pollute waterways and cover arable land with asphalt.”
This wider political posturing can sound preachy. Of Brexit, a “very erudite lawyer” tells DI Jacob Berger, a policeman on Taryn’s trail, “It’s an almost mythical yearning”, having apparently been shoehorned into the narrative to deliver this message. Elsewhere, however, Knox hits the mark. Looking back on past triumphs, Taryn sums up the social-media age when she asks: “Why is happiness so self-congratulatory?”
Berger represents another strand to the intricate plot. The book opens with the murder of Taryn’s sister and Taryn’s subsequent decision to allow “the Muleskinner” to murder the murderer. This revenge killing is the root of both Berger’s and the Sidhe’s interest in Taryn – but not the sum of her troubles. MI5 is on her case too, because of a perceived connection to dodgy server farms in Pakistan.
Crikey, it’s dense. Taryn also has family links to the Firestarter. Despite this, we are fully 400 pages in before she asks the obvious question: “What the bloody hell is in the box?”
This is one of several plot problems. Another is that everybody’s phone is bugged, but Berger and Taryn nonetheless persist in making important, secret arrangements by phone. Then there is the saltwater crocodile that saves the day in Norfolk. Even allowing for the intervention of Valravn and fairy folk wearing bejewelled toe-rings, this is hard to swallow.
Neither does Norfolk, with its dispiriting flatness, ever really come off the page, partly because Knox deploys Americanisms seldom heard in that county: emergency room instead of A&E; realtor instead of estate agent. The characters are similarly nebulous. It’s hard to visualise Taryn or Berger or to understand what motivates them.
The biggest problem, however, is the action scenes. Most are as opaque as this crucial moment: “He darted towards Taryn, scooped her up, and stretched forward. He pointed his free hand at the doors.” Free hand?
If character, plot and action were clearer, the great dollops of fairy weirdness that The Absolute Book dishes up might be easier to digest. As it is, Knox’s 12th novel for adults, while enchanting in places, falls short of the hype.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel