ONLY one-fifth of onshore windfarm projects being considered by the Scottish Government have come from Scottish-owned developers with ministers accused of selling off renewable assets overseas.
The SNP’s Energy Minister has boasted that Scotland has “unrivaled renewable energy potential”, with around one-quarter of Europe’s renewable resources enjoyed by Scotland.
READ MORE: Clean energy revolution of the North Sea is worth 40,000 more jobs and £20bn to the economy in 30 years
But only eight out of 39 proposals in front of the Government, which are either too large for councils to determine or are subject to appeal, are from Scottish firms.
Statistics show that 19 of the bids have been submitted by overseas companies and another 10 are from English-owned firms.
Campaign group Save Our Hills said the statistics show that the SNP Government was viewed as a “soft touch” by foreign-owned developers keen to make money from renewable energy.
The group claims the figures refute any claims that all onshore windfarms provide economic benefits for Scotland, when so many of these plans would result in profits either going abroad or south of the Border.
Among the foreign-owned companies to look at Scotland for windfarm development are those from Canada, France and Germany. Major firms owned by the Norwegian and Swedish governments are also involved.
Rapid expansion
SCOTLAND currently has an onshore wind capacity of around 8.5GW. Plans are in place to rapidly expand offshore wind capacity to 11GW, as part of a blueprint to transform the country into a carbon neutral nation.
But short-term capacity increases for renewable energy will come from onshore wind – with 4.45GW of capacity already approved and another 4GW in the planning stage.
Iain Milligan, spokesman for Save Our Hills, said: “It is clear from these statistics that foreign-owned energy companies consider Scotland a soft touch when it comes to windfarm development.
“They are lining up to cover our landscape in turbines in the hope of making considerable profits at our expense.
READ MORE: Scotland’s transition to green energy is a sign of the times
“It is a complete myth to suggest Scotland always stands to benefit economically from the seemingly limitless spread of windfarms. It’s time the Scottish Government stood up to these developers.
"We’re at saturation point with windfarm development, and ministers must now consider other forms of renewable energy for the sake of our economy – which is so dependent on tourism – and our precious landscape.”
But experts have stressed that renewable energy through offshore and onshore wind power will provide both economic and environmental benefits for Scotland.
The Scottish Government’s statutory adviser, the Committee on Climate Change, has said the Government should focus on ensuring “a favourable planning regime for low-cost onshore wind” and maintain electricity generation from renewable sources at high levels if targets are to be met.
Investment
THE SNP Government’s updated climate change plan points to a pledge by Scottish Power to “invest over £10 billion in North Sea renewables in the coming decade”.
The document also highlights a “new renewable, all-energy consumption target of 50% by 2030, covering electricity, heat and transport”. adding that “there will also be a substantial increase in renewable generation, particularly through new offshore and onshore wind capacity”.
But the BiFab fiasco over wind-turbine contracts has ignited anger that Scottish jobs and supply chains promised as part of boosting the country’s wind capacity have not materialised.
Co-leader of the Scottish Greens, Lorna Slater, said: “We have a wealth of potential here. What we need is the will to invest it and at the same time, make sure that investment is benefiting Scotland.
“In the past, there’s been a real disappointment that the Government has had a very hands-off approach. They handed our valuable resources, wind energy and so on, to massive global corporations and said get on with it.”
“When the jobs failed to materialise in Scotland, when wind turbines are made in China and shipped here instead of being made using Scottish engineering and Scottish manufacturing, when communities have not seen the benefits of this then people get frustrated with it and I think they’re right to be so.”
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said: “It seems the SNP have created green jobs – just not here in Scotland. The SNP has learned nothing from its failure at BiFab and Scottish workers deserve better.
"My climate recovery plan puts economic recovery and climate action hand in hand. To secure new green jobs here in Scotland, we need a bold industrial strategy to ensure the growth in domestic renewable energy production and to deliver a local-first approach to procurement and business support.”
Paul Wheelhouse, the SNP’s Energy Minister, said: “With the limited powers at our disposal we have taken steps to boost locally-owned and community renewables onshore, as well as strengthen the requirements on developers offshore to use local supply chains.
“However, key powers in areas such as markets and revenue support mechanisms that can help shape the development of the sector still lie at Westminster where UK ministers have failed to deliver the actions requested to support Scotland’s energy sector and jobs.
“Only with the full transfer of energy powers through independence can we ensure that Scotland’s massive renewables potential is properly realised and that economic impact is maximised.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel