THE £2.2million contract to 're-imagine' Glasgow's civic centre has been awarded to an architecture firm involved in the design of London's new crossrail station on Bond Street.
John McAslan and Partners has been appointed for the latest phase of the £115million city centre Avenues programme, which has transformed the lower half of Sauchiehall Street into an active travel route for pedestrians and cyclists.
Alongside changes to George Square, the project will focus on public realm improvements to the surrounding areas including George Street, St Vincent Street, John Street, Dundas Street and Dundas Lane.
Proposals include a "high-quality" pedestrian link from the newly re-developed Queen Street Station to Argyle Street, passing through the square, Hanover Street and Miller Street.
READ MORE: Italian brand to open first UK restaurant at prime site on George Square
There will be a focus on infrastructure that encourages the use of public transport and active travel.
The council is considering closing two sides of George Square with the east side outside the City Chambers and the opposite end at Merchants House fully pedestrianised.
The two longer sides would be for bus, taxi, private hire and cycles only between 7am and 7pm.
The council said the timing of the project will factor in the city's hosting of major events, including the climate conference COP26 and the UCI Cycling World Championships. Construction work is due to begin shortly after the latter in the summer of 2023.
The estimated cost for the proposed George Square works is between £8million to £10million, with the works at Hanover Street and Miller Street estimated at £2 to £3million.
READ MORE: Glasgow's exit from lockdown needs 'coordinated attack plan'
The design contract attracted 91 expressions of interest and 17 submissions, with a shortlist of seven teams going to a final consideration.
The council said the views of the public will be central to the plans and said works would not disrupt city centre businesses.
"This project offers a unique opportunity to reimagine George Square and to consider it in the context of being part of a number of civic spaces in the city centre."
The local authority was widely criticised in 1998 when half the grassy beds and trees on George Square were ripped up and replaced by red tarmac, which was laid without warning or public consultation.
John McAslan and Partners, who are leading the current re-design, were appointed to oversee a plan for George Square in 2013.
Six of the shortlisted designs proposed the removal of statues and the addition of a water feature.
READ MORE: 'There is a lot we can learn': The Rotterdam-inspired plan to transform Glasgow City Centre
The jury stalled on the decision before eventually selecting a submission from McAslan.
Then, in a surprise U-turn and after spending around £100,000 on the project, the plans were scrapped by Glasgow City Council.
The firm is currently involved in the design of the new Crossrail station at London's Bond Street and more specifically its integration with the surrounding areas.
The plan includes the transformation of Hanover Square in Mayfair into a "green refuge" with pedestrianisation. The firm was also involved in the transformation of King's Cross station.
George square was laid out in the 1780s, inspired by the Georgian grid system that was taking hold in Edinburgh.
By the 1820s it was a private residential garden surrounded by imposing townhouses but was given over the public after 1842 when Queen Street station opened, and the line between Edinburgh and Glasgow increased activity.
The City Chambers, which now house Glasgow City Council, were completed in 1888.
The £115million Avenues programme in Glasgow city centre is a Glasgow City Region City Deal project, funded by the Scottish and UK Governments.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel